Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Table of Contents

RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.

6312 South Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200N
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(303) 846-6000

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On May 26, 2011

To our Stockholders:

        The annual meeting of stockholders of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. will be held at 9:00 a.m. MDT, on Thursday, May 26, 2011, at the Doubletree Hotel Denver Tech Center, located at 7801 East Orchard Road, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, for the following purposes:

1)

To elect Stephen E. Carley, Pattye L. Moore and Marcus L. Zanner as Class III directors of the Company for three-year terms;



2)

To hold an advisory vote on the executive compensation program for our named executive officers;



3)

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation;



4)

To approve the Second Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, which would increase the number of authorized shares available for issuance and remove the limitation on the number of "full-value" awards issuable under the Company's Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended;



5)

To approve the inclusion of a proposal in the Company's 2012 Proxy Statement to amend the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to declassify the board of directors;



6)

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2011;



7)

To consider a shareholder proposal on succession planning; and



8)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

        Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2011 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

        Your attention is directed to the accompanying proxy statement, which includes information about the matters to be considered at the annual meeting and certain other important information. We encourage you to carefully review the entire proxy statement.

        Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 26, 2011:

        The proxy statement and proxy card are available at http://www.redrobin.com/eproxy.htm.

        We cordially invite you to attend the annual meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend, please sign and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the envelope enclosed for your convenience. Should you receive more than one proxy card because your shares are registered in different names and addresses, each proxy card should be signed and returned to assure that all your shares will be voted.

Table of Contents

        Accompanying this notice and proxy statement is a copy of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Greenwood Village, Colorado
[April 26,] 2011

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

ii

Table of Contents

RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.
6312 South Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200N
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
(303) 846-6000

PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
May 26, 2011

        The board of directors of Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (the Company) is soliciting the enclosed proxy for use at our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 26, 2011, beginning at 9:00 a.m. MDT, at the Doubletree Hotel Denver Tech Center, located at 7801 East Orchard Road, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111, and at any time and date to which the annual meeting may be properly adjourned or postponed. This proxy statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders describe the purpose of the annual meeting. Distribution of these proxy solicitation materials is scheduled to begin on or about April 1, 2011. The proxy statement and proxy card are also available at http://www.redrobin.com/eproxy.htm.

ABOUT THE MEETING

Why am I receiving this proxy statement and proxy card?

        You have received these proxy materials because our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the annual meeting. This proxy statement describes issues on which we would like you to vote at our annual meeting of stockholders. It also provides you with information on these issues so that you may make an informed decision on the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting.

What is the purpose of the annual meeting?

        At our annual meeting, stockholders will vote on the following seven items of business:

1)

To elect Stephen E. Carley, Pattye L. Moore and Marcus L. Zanner as Class III directors of the Company for three-year terms;



2)

To approve the executive compensation program for our named executive officers;



3)

To approve the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation;



4)

To approve the Second Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, which would increase the number of authorized shares available for issuance and remove the limitation on the number of "full-value" awards issuable under the the Company's Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended (the "2007 Plan");



5)

To approve the inclusion of a proposal in the Company's 2012 Proxy Statement to amend the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to declassify the board of directors;



6)

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2011; and



7)

To consider a shareholder proposal on succession planning.

1

Table of Contents

        You will also vote on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

What are the board's recommendations?

        Our board of directors recommends that you vote:

•

FOR election of each of the three (3) nominated directors (see Proposal 1).



•

FOR approval of our executive compensation program for our named executive officers (see Proposal 2).



•

FOR the option of annually as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers (see Proposal 3).



•

FOR approval of the Second Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, which would increase the number of authorized shares available for issuance and remove the limitation on the number of "full-value" awards issuable under the 2007 Plan (see Proposal 4).



•

FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2011 (see Proposal 6).



•

AGAINST the shareholder proposal on succession planning (see Proposal 7).

        The board of directors makes no recommendation on Proposal 5 (approval of the inclusion of a proposal in the Company's 2012 proxy statement to declassify the board of directors). With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the board of directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

What shares are entitled to vote?

        As of April 1, 2011, the record date for the meeting, we had 15,242,512 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share of our common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote on all items being voted on at the meeting. You can vote all of the shares that you owned on the record date. These shares include: (1) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, and (2) shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

        Most stockholders hold their shares through a broker or other holder of record rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

        Stockholder of Record.    If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and we are sending these proxy materials directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the named proxy holder or to vote in person at the meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.

        Beneficial Owner.    If your shares are held in a brokerage account, or by a bank, or other holder of record, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you from that holder together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote and are also invited to attend the annual meeting.

        Since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a "legal proxy" from the broker, bank or other holder of record that

2

Table of Contents

holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting. Your broker, bank or other holder of record has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing the broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares.

Who may attend the meeting?

        All stockholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker or bank (i.e., in street name), you should provide proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as your most recent account statement as of April 1, 2011, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other holder of record, or other similar evidence of ownership. Registration and seating will begin at 8:30 a.m. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.

How may I vote my shares in person at the annual meeting?

        Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the annual meeting. Shares held beneficially in street name may be voted in person only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, bank or other holder of record that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions prior to the meeting as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

How may I vote my shares without attending the annual meeting?

        Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy. If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank or other holder of record. For directions on how to vote, please refer to the instructions included on your proxy card or, for shares held beneficially in street name, the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other holder of record.

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy after I return my proxy card?

        Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change the votes you cast or revoke your proxy at any time before the votes are cast at the meeting by: (1) delivering a written notice of your revocation to our corporate secretary at our principal executive office, 6312 South Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200N, Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111; or (2) executing and delivering a later dated proxy. In addition, the powers of the proxy holders will be suspended if you attend the meeting in person and so request, although attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.

What is a broker non-vote?

        There was an important change last year regarding broker non-votes and director elections. Under a new SEC rule that was effective for the 2010 annual meeting, brokers, banks or other holders of record are no longer permitted to vote in the election of directors if the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. This represents a change from prior years when brokers had discretionary voting authority in the election of directors. In these cases, the broker can register your shares as being present at the annual meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the new rules. This is called a "broker non-vote." If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must instruct the broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted

3

Table of Contents

on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. Accordingly, it is particularly important that beneficial owners instruct their brokers how they wish to vote their shares.

        At this annual meeting, your broker, bank or other holder of record does not have discretionary voting authority to vote on any of the proposals other than proposal 6 (ratification of auditors) without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters. Accordingly, if you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker only has discretionary voting authority under the new rules to vote your shares on the routine matter of ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP, even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you.

What constitutes a quorum?

        The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding as of the record date will constitute a quorum. There must be a quorum for any action to be taken at the meeting (other than an adjournment or postponement of the meeting). If you submit a properly executed proxy card, even if you abstain from voting, then your shares will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. If a broker indicates on a proxy for which it lacks discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a particular matter, commonly referred to as "broker non-votes," those shares will still be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting.

What vote is required to approve each item?

        The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy and eligible to vote will be required to approve each of the proposals at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposals, although they will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. In an uncontested election, each director nominee who receives more "FOR" votes than "AGAINST" votes in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted at the annual meeting will be elected. If a nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast, then the resulting vacancy will be filled only by a majority vote of the directors then in office, and the director(s) so chosen shall serve for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders at which the term of office of the class to which they have been elected expires or until such director's successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

        If you receive more than one proxy card, it means that you hold shares registered in more than one name or brokerage account. You should sign and return all proxies for each proxy card that you receive in order to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

How may I vote on each of the proposals?

        In the election of directors, you may vote FOR any or all of the nominees, or your vote may be WITHHELD with respect to any or all of the nominees. For the other matters, you may vote FOR or AGAINST each proposal, or you may indicate that you wish to ABSTAIN from voting on a proposal.

Who will count the proxy votes?

        Votes will be counted by our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, which we have retained to act as the inspector of election for the annual meeting.

4

Table of Contents

How will voting on any other business be conducted?

        We do not expect any matters to be presented for a vote at the meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement. If you grant a proxy, either of the officers named as proxy holder, Stephen E. Carley or Katherine L. Scherping or their nominee(s) or substitute(s), will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters that are properly presented for a vote at the meeting. If a nominee is not available as a candidate for Class III director, the person named as the proxy holder will vote your proxy for another candidate nominated by our board of directors.

What rights of appraisal or similar rights of dissenters do I have with respect to any matter to be acted upon at the meeting?

        No action is proposed herein for which the laws of the state of Delaware or our Bylaws provide a right of our stockholders to dissent and obtain appraisal of or payment for such stockholders' common stock.

How do I submit a stockholder proposal for consideration at next year's annual meeting?

        Proposals for Inclusion in Proxy Statement.    For your proposal or director nomination to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for next year's meeting, your written proposal must be received by our corporate secretary at our principal executive office no later than [December 28,] 2011. If we change the date of next year's meeting by more than 30 days from the date of this year's meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials. You should also be aware that your proposal must comply with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations regarding inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials and our Bylaws.

        Proposals to be Addressed at Meeting (but not included in proxy statement).    In order for you to raise a proposal (including director nominations) from the floor during next year's meeting, our corporate secretary must receive a written notice of the proposal no later than [March 12,] 2012 and no earlier than [February 11,] 2012, and it must contain the additional information required by our Bylaws. All proposals received after [March 12,] 2012 will be considered untimely. You may obtain a complete copy of our Bylaws by submitting a written request to our corporate secretary at our principal executive office. If we change the date of next year's meeting by more than 30 days from the date contemplated at this year's meeting, in order for the proposal to be timely, we must receive your written proposal at least 90 days before the date of next year's meeting or no more than 10 days following the day on which the meeting date is publicly announced.

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN PERSONS

        Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Except as indicated by footnote, and except for community property laws where applicable, the persons named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial ownership for each table is based on 15,242,512 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2011.

5

Table of Contents

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

        The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock as of March 31, 2011. All information is taken from or based upon ownership filings made by such persons with the SEC or upon information provided by such persons to the Company.

6

Table of Contents

7

Table of Contents

Stock Ownership of Directors and Management

        The following table contains information about the beneficial ownership (unless otherwise indicated) of our common stock as of March 31, 2011 by:

•

each of our directors, including the board's nominees for election or re-election;



•

each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table; and



•

all directors and current executive officers as a group.

8

Table of Contents

9

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        We maintain five equity-based compensation plans—the 2000 Management Performance Common Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Stock Plan), the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2002 Stock Plan), the 2004 Performance Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan), the 2007 Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP). Our stockholders have approved each of these plans.

        The following table sets forth for our equity compensation plans in the aggregate, the number of shares of our common stock subject to outstanding options and rights under these plans, the

10

Table of Contents

weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, and the number of shares remaining available for future award grants under these plans as of December 26, 2010:

PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

        As of the date of this proxy statement, our board of directors consists of eleven directors. Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides for three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms. Class III currently consists of three directors whose terms expire at this annual meeting; Class I currently consists of five directors whose terms expire at our 2012 annual meeting; and Class II currently consists of three directors whose terms expire at our 2013 annual meeting.

        Our board of directors has nominated Stephen E. Carley, Pattye L. Moore and Marcus L. Zanner to continue to serve as our Class III directors. If elected, Messrs. Carley, Zanner and Ms. Moore will continue to serve in office until our Annual Meeting in 2014 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified, or until the earlier of their respective deaths, resignations or retirement.

        Messrs. Carley, Zanner and Ms. Moore have each consented to be named as a nominee in this proxy statement, and we expect that each of them will be able to serve if elected. Should Mr. Carley, Mr. Zanner or Ms. Moore become unable or unwilling to accept his or her nomination for election, our board of directors can name a substitute nominee and the persons named as proxies in the proxy card, or their nominees or substitutes, will vote your shares for such substitute nominee unless an instruction to the contrary is written on your proxy card.

11

Table of Contents

Directors and Nominees

        Below, you can find the principal occupation and other information about each of the Class III directors and each of the other directors whose term of office will continue after the meeting.

Director Nominees—Class III Directors

        Pattye L. Moore, 53, joined the Company as a director in August 2007 and was appointed as Chair of the board of directors in February 2010. Ms. Moore is a business strategy consultant and the author of Confessions from the Corner Office, a book on leadership instincts. Ms. Moore was on the board of directors for Sonic Corp. from 2000 through January 2006 and was the President of Sonic from January 2002 to November 2004. She held numerous senior management positions during her 12 years at Sonic, including Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President—Marketing and Brand Development and Vice President—Marketing. Prior to joining Sonic Corp., she served as a senior executive and account supervisor on the Sonic account at the advertising agency Advertising, Inc.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Ms. Moore brings to the board of directors, among her other skills and qualifications, significant senior management, marketing, business strategy and brand development experience as well as deep knowledge of the restaurant industry. During her tenure at Sonic, the company grew from $900 million in system-wide sales with 1,100 units to over $3 billion in system-wide sales and 3,000 units. Ms. Moore was named one of the top 100 marketers by Advertising Age magazine in 2000 and one of the top 50 women in foodservice by Nation's Restaurant News in 2002. Ms. Moore's directorships at other companies also provide her with extensive corporate governance experience. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Ms. Moore should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    ONEOK (2002-present).

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    Sonic Corp. (2000-2006).

        Stephen E. Carley, 58, joined the Company as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and as a director in September 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Carley served from April 2001 to August 2010 as the Chief Executive Officer of El Pollo Loco, a privately held restaurant company headquartered in Costa Mesa, California. Prior to his service at El Pollo Loco, Mr. Carley served in various management positions with several companies, including, PhotoPoint Corp., Universal City Hollywood, PepsiCo and the Taco Bell Group. Mr. Carley holds a master's degree with a concentration in marketing from Northwestern University and a bachelor's degree in finance from the University of Illinois in Urbana, Ill.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Carley brings to the Company and the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, extensive restaurant industry experience and valuable executive leadership, which he gained as a chief executive officer of a corporation with significant, large-scale operations. He has extensive knowledge and understanding of the restaurant industry, marketing and brand familiarity, as well as significant insight into and experience with franchise operations. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Carley should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    EPL Intermediate, Inc. (publicly traded debt) (2004-2010).

        Marcus L. Zanner, 66, joined the Company as a director in June 2009. Mr. Zanner is the former President and majority owner of Great Western Dining, which operated for more than 25 years with over 40 restaurants, including 13 Red Robin restaurants in Washington that were purchased by the Company in 2006. Mr. Zanner was associated with the institutional sales division of Merrill Lynch for a

12

Table of Contents

period of twelve years and has served on the board of directors of Fortune Bank in Seattle, Washington since September 2008. Mr. Zanner has also served on the board of directors for the Washington Restaurant Association and the National Restaurant Association.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Zanner brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, extensive restaurant industry experience along with financial services experience. He has significant knowledge and understanding of our business and operations, industry leadership, and brand familiarity, as well as insight into franchise operations. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Zanner should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    None.

Continuing Directors for Term Ending Upon the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders—Class I Directors

        Robert B. Aiken, 48, Mr. Aiken joined the Company as a director in March 2010. Mr. Aiken is a Managing Director of Capwell Partners, LLC, a Chicago-based private equity firm. Mr. Aiken previously served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Foodservice (USF). At USF, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2007 to February 2010, as President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2005 to July 2007, and Executive Vice President of Sales/Marketing & Supply Chain from February 2004 to October 2005.

        Prior to joining USF, Mr. Aiken held several positions from 1994 through 2000 at Specialty Foods Corp. of Deerfield, Illinois, including Chief Executive Officer of its Metz Baking Company subsidiary. From 2000 until 2004, Mr. Aiken also served as President and Principal of Milwaukee Sign Co. and early in Mr. Aiken's career, he worked as a business lawyer, first with the firm Sidley & Austin in Chicago and then Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati in Palo Alto, California.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Aiken brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, experience as a chief executive officer of a corporation with significant operations and a large, labor-intensive workforce. He gained extensive experience in operations and logistics, as well as an understanding of the dining industry through his service at USF. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Aiken should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    United Stationers Inc. (2010-present).

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    None.

        J. Taylor Simonton, 66, joined the Company as a director in September 2005 and was appointed chair of the Company's audit committee in October 2005. Mr. Simonton spent 35 years at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, including 23 years as an audit partner in the firm's Accounting and Business Advisory Services practice before retiring in 2001. Until February 2007, Mr. Simonton served on the board of directors of Fischer Imaging Corporation, a public company that designed, manufactured and marketed specialty medical imaging systems, and served as its audit committee chair. He is currently the audit committee chair of Zynex, Inc., a public company that manufactures and markets medical devices for the electrotherapy and stroke and spinal injury rehabilitation markets. Mr. Simonton is also lead director and audit committee chair of Keating Capital, Inc., a publicly reporting closed-end investment fund that makes non-controlling investments in private and small market capitalization public companies.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Simonton brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, significant experience in accounting and finance that he gained through 35 years of service at PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC, one of the world's largest accounting and professional services firm, including 23 years as an Accounting and Business Advisory Partner. In

13

Table of Contents

addition, Mr. Simonton is well versed in corporate governance; he holds a Certificate of Director Education from the Corporate Directors Institute of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) and is its chairman and past president of the NACD chapter in Colorado. He also has served on several other public company board of directors. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Simonton should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    Keating Capital, Inc. (May 2008-present) and Zynex, Inc. (October 2008-present).

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    Fischer Imaging Corporation—Denver, CO (January 2003—February 2007).

        James T. Rothe, 67, joined the Company as a director in October 2004 and served as chair of the Company's compensation committee from January 2005 to May 31, 2009. Mr. Rothe has served since January 2004 as Managing Director and co-founder of Roaring Fork Capital Management, LLC, which is the General Partner of Roaring Fork Capital SBIC, LP with offices in Colorado Springs and Denver, Colorado and Dallas, Texas. Mr. Rothe is a Professor Emeritus of the College of Business at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs where he served as Professor 1986-2004 and Dean of the College 1986-1994. Mr. Rothe was also a Principal in the Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group, a venture capital firm (three funds, total $140 million) from 1988-1999. Mr. Rothe served as President of Pearle Vision Center and Texas State Optical. He also served as Vice President of Marketing and Senior Vice President of Marketing and Merchandising for Pearle Vision Center. Mr. Rothe holds a Ph.D. in marketing and finance from the University of Wisconsin—Madison.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Rothe brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, a unique understanding of the Company's strategies and operations through his prior board service. In addition, Mr. Rothe has significant experience in business and finance that he gained while helping to build Pearle Health Services, Inc., and participating as a key member of a venture capital partnership that successfully invested in companies such as Bizmart, PetSmart, Hot Topic and Cheap Tickets. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Rothe should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    Independent Trustee of the Janus Funds (1997-present).

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Richard J. Howell, 68, joined the Company as a director in September 2005. Mr. Howell was an audit partner with Arthur Andersen LLP for over 25 years before retiring in 2002. From January 2004 through May 2009, Mr. Howell served as an adjunct professor of auditing at the Cox School of Business at Southern Methodist University, and he served in a similar capacity from August 2002 to December 2003 at the Neely School of Business at Texas Christian University.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Howell brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, significant experience in accounting and information systems, as well as knowledge of controls and financial reporting requirements of public companies. In addition, during Mr. Howell's career in public accounting he gained significant knowledge of due diligence, mergers and acquisitions and risk management. Mr. Howell's work with audit committees of numerous public reporting companies and his current directorship roles have provided substantial experience in corporate governance. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Howell should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    Independent Trustee for the LKCM Funds (July 2005-present).

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    None.

14

Table of Contents

        David Makula, 33, joined the Company as a director in April 2011. Mr. Makula is the founder and Chief Investment Officer of Oak Street Capital Management LLC, an investment firm that manages fundamentally-driven investment portfolios for institutional and high net worth investors. Previously, Mr. Makula participated in the management of a $700M investment fund at Coghill Capital Management, LLC, an investment advisor based in Chicago. Prior to joining Coghill Capital Management, Mr. Makula began his career as a Mergers & Acquisitions investment banker at Salomon Smith Barney in New York, New York. He holds a B.S. in Accountancy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, graduating with high honors, and is a Certified Public Accountant.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Makula brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, significant capital markets and capital allocation experience gained as the Chief Investment Officer of Oak Street Capital Management, LLC, and through his other investment experience, including investment banking, and merger and acquisitions work. Mr. Makula has gained extensive knowledge of value creation in the restaurant industry through Oak Street Capital Management, LLC's investments. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Makula should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    None.

Continuing Directors for Term Ending upon the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders—Class II Directors

        Lloyd L. Hill, 67, joined the Company as a director in March 2010. Mr. Hill is the former Chairman and CEO of Applebee's International, Inc. (Applebee's), based in Overland Park, Kansas. Mr. Hill joined Applebee's as Chief Operating Officer in January 1994, and was named president in December 1994. He became Co-Chief Executive Officer in January 1997; Chief Executive Officer in January 1998; and was elected Chairman of the Board in May 2000. Mr. Hill first began serving on Applebee's board as an independent member in 1989 and served until November 2007. Mr. Hill retired as Chief Executive Officer of Applebee's in September 2006.

        Prior to joining Applebee's, Mr. Hill served as president and director of Kimberly Quality Care (KQC), a market leader in home healthcare and nurse personnel staffing. Mr. Hill received his master's degree in business administration from Rockhurst University in Kansas City, Missouri.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Hill brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, executive leadership and operations skills developed from his years of experience as a chief executive officer of several companies. As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Applebee's, Mr. Hill substantially expanded Applebee's business while successfully maintaining relationships with Applebee's stockholders. Under Mr. Hill's leadership, Applebee's grew into the largest casual dining concept in the world, with nearly 1,900 restaurants in 49 states and 17 countries. In 2005, Mr. Hill was named by Institutional Investor magazine as one of America's Best CEOs and as one of the top-performing CEOs within the restaurant industry. Mr. Hill also brings deep knowledge of the casual-dining industry. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Hill should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    Applebee's International, Inc. (1989-2007).

        Glenn B. Kaufman, 43, joined the Company as a director in August 2010. Mr. Kaufman is a Managing Member of the D Cubed Group, a private market investment firm with a long-term value creation strategy centered on supporting each company and its executives in driving continuous improvement in business quality. Prior to forming D Cubed, he spent 11 years at American Securities Capital Partners, where he was a Managing Director since 2001. During his tenure, Mr. Kaufman spearheaded the firm's investing in the restaurant, food service and franchising, and healthcare sectors.

15

Table of Contents

He served as Chairman or a Director of Potbelly Sandwich Works, El Pollo Loco, Press Ganey Associates, Anthony International and DRL Holdings. He spent four years as an attorney with Cravath, Swaine & Moore and worked previously in the small business consulting group of Price Waterhouse. Mr. Kaufman holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the Wharton School of Business of the University of Pennsylvania and a law degree from Harvard University.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Kaufman brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, valuable executive leadership and corporate governance experience, as well as a extensive understanding of restaurant operations and franchising. Mr. Kaufman gained restaurant and franchising expertise while serving as the Managing Director of American Securities Capital Partners. In addition, Mr. Kaufman also has legal expertise, as he served as an attorney for Cravath, Swaine & Moore for four years. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Kaufman should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    None.

        Stuart I. Oran, 60, Mr. Oran joined the Company as a director in March 2010. Mr. Oran is the Managing Member of Roxbury Capital Group LLC, a New York based merchant banking firm he founded in 2002. Mr. Oran is also the co-founder of Bond Street Holdings LLC, a bank holding company formed to acquire failed banks in FDIC-assisted transactions.

        From 1994 to 2002, Mr. Oran held a number of senior executive positions at UAL Corporation and its operating subsidiary, United Airlines, including Executive Vice President—Corporate Affairs (responsible for United's legal, public, governmental and regulatory affairs, and all of United's properties and facilities), Senior Vice President—International (P&L responsibility for United's international division comprised of its operations and employees (approximately 12,000) in 27 countries), and President and CEO of Avolar, United's business aviation line of business. During that period, Mr. Oran also served as a director of United Airlines (the operating subsidiary) and several of its subsidiaries, and on the Management Committee, Risk Management Committee and Alternative Asset Investment Committee of UAL. Prior to joining UAL and United, Mr. Oran was a corporate partner at the New York law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP.

        Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:    Mr. Oran brings to the board of directors, among his other skills and qualifications, valuable business, leadership and management, and strategic planning experience which he gained during his employment with UAL Corporation and as a board member of Wendy's International, Inc. He also brings significant knowledge of the restaurant industry from his board service at Wendy's. In addition, Mr. Oran has experience serving as a director of a number of other large public companies which provided him with extensive corporate governance experience. In light of the foregoing, our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Oran should continue as a member of our board.

        Other Public Company Board Service:    Deerfield Capital Corp. (2008-present).

        Recent Past Public Company Board Service:    Hughes Telematics (f/k/a Polaris Acquisition Corp.) (2007-2009) and Wendy's International, Inc. (2005-2008).

Required Vote

        In an uncontested election, each director nominee who receives more "FOR" votes than "AGAINST" votes in person or represented by proxy and entitled to be voted at the annual meeting will be elected.

16

Table of Contents

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

        Our board of directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of Ms. Moore, FOR the election of Mr. Carley, and FOR the election of Mr. Zanner as Class III directors on our board of directors.

Selecting Nominees for Director

        Our board has delegated to the nominating and governance committee the responsibility for reviewing and recommending nominees for director. In evaluating a director candidate, the nominating and governance committee will consider the candidate's independence, character, corporate governance skills and abilities, business experience, industry specific experience, training and education, commitment to performing the duties of a director, and other skills, abilities or attributes that fill specific needs of the board or its committees. While there is no formal policy with regard to consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, the nominating and governance committee considers diversity in business experience, professional expertise, gender and ethnic background, along with various other factors when evaluating director nominees. The nominating and governance committee will use the same criteria in evaluating candidates suggested by stockholders.

        The nominating and governance committee recommends director candidates for nomination to the board. The board determines which candidates to nominate or appoint, as appropriate, after considering the recommendation of the committee.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Governance Principles

        The board and management believe that the Company's relationships with its stockholders and other stakeholders are an important part of its corporate governance profile, and it recognizes the value of continuing communications. Among other things, engagement with our stockholders helps us to understand the larger context and impact of our operations, learn about expectations for our performance, and assess emerging issues that may affect our governance practices, business or other aspects of our operations. This approach has helped us to identify mutual perspectives and goals and to adopt a collaborative approach to these relationships, which has resulted in our receiving essential input from our stockholders. To this end, we regularly engage with our stockholders through attendance at investor conferences, press releases and other stockholder communications and individual meetings throughout the year.

        We also recognize the connection between good corporate governance and our ability to create and sustain value for our stockholders. In response to evolving governance practices, regulatory changes and concerns of our stockholders, the Company made a number of changes to its corporate governance practices in 2009 and early 2010. These changes in 2010 include, among other things:

•

amending the Company's equity plan to prohibit any type of actions that may constitute a repricing of options;



•

electing four new independent directors to the board of directors, each of whom has an extensive understanding of, and experience as a senior executive in, one or more areas including restaurant operations, franchising, food service, investment banking and finance;



•

appointing a new chief executive officer with extensive restaurant operations and franchise experience, among other attributes;



•

adopting a majority voting standard for directors except in contested elections; and



•

separating the Chair and CEO role and appointing an independent Chair.

17

Table of Contents

        In addition, the Company has undertaken, or committed to undertake, the following actions, each of which demonstrate the Company's continuing commitment to good corporate governance practices:

•

Seeking advice from shareholders whether to include a proposal in its 2012 proxy statement to declassify the Company's board of directors;



•

Worked in cooperation with certain of the Company's stockholders to revise its corporate governance guidelines to adopt a formal succession planning process; and



•

Initially raising the acquisition threshold in its Rights Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2010, from 15% to 16.5% and deciding to allow the Rights Agreement to expire on the date after the annual meeting.

        In addition, in January 2011, we were approached by representatives of Oak Street Capital Management, LLC and its affiliates, stockholders in the Company. They expressed concern about the Company's performance and business strategy, among other things. Following several meetings and extended discussions, on April 5, 2011, we entered into a letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement") with Oak Street Capital Management, LLC, on behalf of themselves and their respective affiliated funds, persons and entities. Pursuant to the terms of the Letter Agreement, David Makula was appointed to the board effective April 5, 2011 as a Class I director to serve until the Company's 2012 annual stockholders meeting, and appointed to the Company's audit committee. If Mr. Makula becomes unable to serve as a director of the Company due to injury, illness, death or other similar circumstance on or before December 31, 2011, or if Mr. Makula leaves the board after December 31, 2011 for any reason prior to the end of his then-current term, Oak Street is entitled to recommend to the board one or more replacement directors. The board may withhold approval of any replacement director recommended by Oak Street, which approval cannot be unreasonably withheld. The Agreement also provides that, among other things, the members of the Oak Street investor group will abide by certain support, standstill, and together with the Company, nondisparagement obligations, through the date immediately following the day on which the 2012 annual stockholders meeting is held or, if later, such date that is five months following the latest date on which either Mr. Makula or his replacement is a director of the Company.

        The board of directors seeks to ensure that good governance and responsible business principles and practices are part of our culture, values and the way we do business. In achieving this goal, the board of directors has previously established corporate governance guidelines that it follows with respect to corporate governance matters, which are available on the investor relations section of our website at www.redrobin.com. The board of directors reviews the governance guidelines annually to assure that they are timely, effective and supportive of the board's oversight and other responsibilities.

Board Leadership Structure

        The board recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimal leadership structures so as to provide independent oversight of management. At this time, we believe the optimal leadership structure for our board is to separate the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Pattye Moore currently serves as Chair of the Board due to, among other things, her prior experience on public company boards of directors, as well as her vast understanding of the restaurant industry.

        We believe that having a non-executive chair of the board is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. The separation of the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer allows Mr. Carley to focus on managing the Company's business and operations, and allows Ms. Moore to focus on board matters especially in light of increasing regulation and scrutiny on public company boards. Further, we believe that the separation of those roles ensures the independence of the board in its oversight role of evaluating and assessing the chief executive officer and management generally.

18

Table of Contents

Role in Risk Oversight

        Our board, together with our executive officers, has the primary responsibility for enterprise risk management within our Company. The board delegates many of its risk oversight functions to the audit committee. Under its charter, the audit committee is responsible for discussing with management policies with respect to financial risk assessment and enterprise risk management, including guidelines to govern the process by which major financial and accounting risk assessment and management is undertaken by the Company. The audit committee also oversees our corporate compliance programs as well as the internal audit function. In addition to the audit committee's work in overseeing certain risk management functions, our full board regularly engages in discussions of the most significant risks that the Company is facing and how these risks are being managed, and the board receives reports on these risk areas from senior officers of the Company. The board believes that the work undertaken by the audit committee, together with the work of the full board and the senior officers of the Company, enables the board to effectively oversee the Company's risk management.

Board Membership and Director Independence

        Our board of directors has determined that each of Robert B. Aiken, Lloyd L. Hill, Richard J. Howell, Glenn B. Kaufman, David Makula, Pattye L. Moore, Stuart I. Oran, James T. Rothe, and J. Taylor Simonton qualifies as an independent director under rules promulgated by the SEC and The NASDAQ Stock Market® listing standards. Only independent directors are appointed to the board's three standing committees; audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and governance committee. Accordingly, all members of each board committee are independent in accordance with The NASDAQ Stock Market® listing standards. There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers, directors or nominees for directors.

        During fiscal year 2010, the board of directors held 23 formal meetings in addition to a number of informal telephone conferences. Each of our current directors who were directors at such time attended at least 75% of the aggregate total of meetings of the board of directors and committees on which he or she served. The non-management directors of the Company meet at least quarterly throughout the year and as necessary or appropriate in executive sessions at which members of management are not present.

        The board of directors strongly encourages each of the directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors attended our 2010 annual meeting (other than those directors who joined the board after the 2010 annual meeting).

Committees of the Board of Directors

        Our board of directors has established three standing committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and governance committee. The full text of all of the charters for each board committee is available on the investor relations section of our website at www.redrobin.com. Each of our standing committees meets at least once each quarter. In addition, other regular and special meetings are scheduled as necessary and appropriate depending on the responsibilities of the particular committee. Each committee regularly meets in executive sessions without management present. In addition to our standing committees, during 2010, the board created a Succession Committee for the purposes of seeking a new chief executive officer of the Company, and a Strategy Committee, for the purposes of assisting Mr. Carley and management in developing the strategic direction of the Company. The Succession Committee was disbanded promptly after the completion of the CEO search (September 2010).

        Audit Committee.    The audit committee is currently comprised of Richard J. Howell (chair), Lloyd L. Hill, Stuart I. Oran, J. Taylor Simonton, and David Makula, and operates pursuant to a written charter. The audit committee oversees and reviews the preparation and disclosure of the

19

Table of Contents

Company's consolidated financial statements and the preparation and filing of periodic financial reports, which include the requisite certifications by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer. The audit committee is also responsible for selecting and retaining the independent registered public accounting firm; approving the budget for fees to be paid to the independent registered public accounting firm for audit services and for appropriate non-audit services; overseeing the relationship between the Company and the independent registered public accounting firm and acting as the board of directors' primary avenue of communication with them; overseeing enterprise fraud risk, and selecting, retaining and overseeing the internal audit function of the Company. The audit committee's responsibilities also include other matters as set forth in its charter.

        The board also has determined that each of Mr. Howell and Mr. Simonton is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by rules adopted by the SEC. A discussion of the role of the audit committee is provided under "Audit Committee Report."

        The audit committee met 10 times in fiscal year 2010.

        Compensation Committee.    The compensation committee is currently comprised of Lloyd L. Hill (chair), Pattye L. Moore and James T. Rothe. The compensation committee operates pursuant to a written charter. Functions performed by the compensation committee include: developing and recommending to the board of directors an annual performance evaluation of our chief executive officer, approving salary and short-term and long-term incentive compensation programs for all senior executives; and reviewing and adopting employee benefit plans and reviewing and approving compensation for directors.

        The specific nature of the compensation committee's responsibilities as they relate to executive officers is set forth under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis."

        The compensation committee held 20 formal meetings in addition to several informal telephone conferences in fiscal year 2010.

        Nominating and Governance Committee.    The nominating and governance committee is currently comprised of Robert B. Aiken (chair), Glenn B. Kaufman, Stuart I. Oran and J. Taylor Simonton and operates pursuant to a written charter. The nominating and governance committee identifies, evaluates and recommends to the board of directors candidates for appointment or election to the board, as appropriate. The committee meets annually during the fourth quarter to determine whether to recommend to the board to include the nomination of incumbent directors with expiring terms in the proxy statement. The committee meets at other times as needed to consider candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur. At least once a year, the committee considers whether the number of directors is appropriate for the Company's needs and recommends to the board any changes in the number of directors, and reviews the performance of the board.

        A stockholder may submit the name of a director candidate for consideration by the nominating and governance committee by writing to: Nominating and Governance Committee, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., 6312 South Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111. The stockholder must submit the following information in support of the candidate: (a) all information relating to such person as would be required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of such nominees as directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and such person's written consent to serve as a director if elected; (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (i) the name and address of such stockholder, as they appear on the Company's books, and of such beneficial owner, (ii) the class and number of shares of the Company that are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and such beneficial owner, (iii) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation or similar rights,

20

Table of Contents

hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the date of such stockholder's notice by, or on behalf of, such stockholder and such beneficial owner, whether or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in underlying shares of capital stock of the Company, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such stockholder or such beneficial owner, with respect to shares of stock of the Company, and (iv) whether either such stockholder or beneficial owner intends to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of, in the case of a proposal, at least the percentage of the Company's voting shares required under applicable law to carry the proposal or, in the case of a nomination or nominations, a sufficient number of holders of the Company's voting shares to elect such nominee or nominees.

        The nominating and governance committee held 13 formal meetings in addition to several informal telephone conferences in fiscal year 2010.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

        You may communicate with any director, the entire board of directors, the independent directors or any committee by sending a letter to the director, the board of directors, or the committee addressed to: Board of Directors, 6312 South Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 200N, Greenwood Village, CO 80111, or by sending an e-mail to: Board@redrobin.com. The Company's chief legal officer will review all communications, categorize them, and forward them to the appropriate board member. Messages pertaining to administrative matters, ordinary business matters, personal grievances, and similar issues will be forwarded to the appropriate member of management.

        With respect to issues arising under the Company's Code of Ethics, you may also communicate directly with the chair of the audit committee or the compliance officer in the manner provided in the Company's Problem Resolution and Whistleblower Policy and Reporting Procedures. Both the Code of Ethics and the Problem Resolution and Whistleblower Policy and Reporting Procedures may be found on the investor relations section of our website at: www.redrobin.com.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Transactions with Related Persons

        Jonathon James.    Jonathon James, our former Senior Vice President of Enterprise Services, who resigned in September 2010 is a founder and former CEO of GrassRoots Leadership, LLC (GRL), a management consulting firm located in Denver, Colorado. Prior to Mr. James' employment with the Company, GRL provided consulting services to the Company from the beginning of September 2006 to October 2009, specifically focusing on executive leadership development, new restaurant opening processes, succession planning, and recruitment and retention processes and assessments. During fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2009, the Company paid GRL approximately $773,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, for consulting services and certain management training material. Mr. James informed the Company that he divested his ownership interest in GRL upon acceptance of his position with the Company.

        Marcus L. Zanner.    Marcus L. Zanner, a director of the Company, is a principal of and holds, directly or indirectly, interests of between 45% and 100% in three privately-held entities that hold the leases for three of the Company's restaurants in Washington. Such leases were assumed in connection with the purchase of the 13 Red Robin® restaurants from Great Western Dining in 2006. For fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010, the Company paid total rent of approximately $1.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for these three restaurants, including percentage rent, and related taxes and fees.

21

Table of Contents

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

        The board of directors has recognized that transactions between the Company and certain related persons present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest. In order to ensure that the Company acts in the best interest of its stockholders, the Board has delegated the review and approval of related party transactions to the audit committee. Any related party transaction required to be disclosed in accordance with applicable SEC regulations must be reviewed and approved by the audit committee. In reviewing a proposed transaction, the audit committee must (i) satisfy itself that it has been fully informed as to the related party's relationship and interest and as to the material facts of the proposed transaction and (ii) consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to the committee. After its review, the audit committee will only approve or ratify transactions that are fair to the Company and not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        None of the members of the compensation committee has been or will be one of the Company's officers or employees. The Company does not have any interlocking relationships between its executive officers and the compensation committee and the executive officers and compensation committee of any other entities, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

        To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and representations that no other reports were required, during fiscal year 2010, all of our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners timely complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

        In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), we discuss our compensation philosophy and goals, and the material elements of the compensation program for our executive officers, including our named executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table. We include programs that were in place for 2010, and changes we have implemented in 2011. Our compensation committee oversees and approves the design and implementation of our executive and board compensation.

Executive Summary

        As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2010 and elsewhere in this proxy statement, there were a number of important changes in our governance and operations in 2010. Under the leadership of the board and our new chief executive officer, we implemented a number of significant initiatives to focus our efforts on driving performance improvement and re-establishing our company operations as best-in-class. These initiatives, which we call Project RED, are designed to increase same store sales, reduce expenses, improve restaurant level margins and drive overall corporate profitability. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we saw improvements in many of these areas, which are providing the momentum to continue increasing shareholder value, which is the basis for our compensation programs.

22

Table of Contents

        Accordingly, our compensation objectives have been designed to link incentives and rewards for our employees to the achievement of sustainable short-term and long-term Company performance reflected in top-line growth in sales and guest counts, and the establishment of solid business foundations that improve and support growth and profitability. To achieve these objectives, we utilize a mix of short-term and long-term compensation strategies that place a significant portion of cash and equity compensation at risk, and align compensation with a multi-year performance expectation. Our strategies include a component of lower base pay combined with potential for increased levels of compensation for performance through incentive or bonus awards. Finally, a significant portion of each executive's compensation is based on long-term equity awards that vest over multi-year periods or have performance based vesting requirements. Our equity ownership guidelines for executives confirm the long-term nature of our equity grants. Because a material part of our executives' compensation is tied to achievement of long-term goals, the compensation committee believes our compensation programs will not create incentives to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The compensation committee continually evaluates and revises our compensation program as necessary to ensure that it is competitive with the market and our peers, and promotes achievement of our business objectives.

Recent Compensation Activity

Summary of 2010 Compensation Activity

        In late 2009 and early 2010, in response to both feedback that management received from our stockholders, and legislative and other activity surrounding corporate governance and executive compensation, the Company's board of directors and compensation committee initiated certain actions, in addition to addressing routine compensation matters, to: (a) modify specific elements of an executive's compensation and (b) improve the governance process around executive compensation and the pay-for-performance orientation of the Company's executive compensation program. These actions included the following:

•

Base Salaries.  The compensation committee did not approve salary increases for the named executive officers for 2010, except an increase granted to Dennis Mullen, our former chief executive officer, in connection with a modification to his employment agreement.



•

2010 Bonus Targets.  For 2010, the Company's bonus incentives were more heavily weighted toward company performance targets designed to develop sustainable increases in sales, guest counts and profitability. The compensation committee approved a cash bonus incentive program for executive officers that was 90% based on achievement of Company EBITDA goals and 10% based on personal goals. The Company did not achieve its EBITDA goals; consequently no bonuses were paid with respect to the EBITDA portion of the program. However, bonuses were paid to executive officers based on the achievement of their personal goals, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. See also, "Elements of our Executive Compensation Program—2010 Bonuses."



•

Long-term Incentive Program.  As part of the compensation committee's increased emphasis on pay for performance, equity grants made to executives in 2010 consisted of a mix of time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) based on total shareholder return (TSR). The performance-based RSUs have a three-year performance period with cliff vesting at the end of such period and the value of the grant will range from 0% up to 225% of the base grant amount, depending on performance against a peer group of 42 restaurants (based on the same eight digit GICS code for restaurants as the Company). The time-based RSUs vest ratably over four years on the anniversary date of the grant.

23

Table of Contents

•

Change to CEO Compensation.  The board of directors amended the employment agreement of Dennis Mullen, the Company's former chief executive officer until September 2010, to eliminate, among other things, payment and reimbursement for personal commuting expenses and the 280G tax gross-up provisions for commuting and change-in-control severance payments. See the discussion of Mr. Mullen's Employment Agreement below.



•

Prohibition on Repricing.  Our board of directors also amended our Amended and Restated 2007 Performance Incentive Plan to specifically prohibit any type of actions that may constitute a repricing of options, including cash tender offers or other exchange of equity, without stockholder approval.



•

Tally Sheets.  Beginning in 2010, the compensation committee added to its processes a review of executive officers' "tally sheets," which summarize each officer's direct compensation, benefits and perquisites, equity value under various scenarios, and the Company's potential severance for terminating the named officers' employment. The tally sheets assist the compensation committee by providing not only greater visibility into the total compensation for each officer, but also visibility into the sensitivity of compensation to performance, interaction between various elements and kinds of compensation and other relevant data measures.

Executive Employment and Departures

        In September 2010, Stephen Carley was appointed our new chief executive officer, replacing Dennis Mullen, who had served since August 2005 and left the Company in September 2010. We include actions taken with respect to the compensation of both Mr. Carley and Mr. Mullen below.

        Dennis B. Mullen.    In January 2010, Mr. Mullen's employment agreement was modified to increase his annual base salary from $725,000 to $800,000, and to eliminate payment and reimbursement for personal commuting expenses and tax gross-ups for commuting and change-in-control severance payments. The modification also added a cutback provision that would reduce any change-in-control severance below the threshold that would trigger applicable excise tax. In addition, Mr. Mullen waived his contractual right to receive a bonus equal to 50% of his salary in 2010, 2011, and 2012, and instead agreed to participate in performance bonus plans on the same terms as the other named officers. Mr. Mullen's equity grants for 2010 were 100% performance-based and calculated on total shareholder return.

        Mr. Mullen departed the Company effective September 13, 2010 (Mullen Effective Date). Pursuant to the terms of his Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to pay to Mr. Mullen (i) his current annual base salary of $800,000 over the twelve-month period beginning on the Mullen Effective Date; and (ii) a cash payment in the amount of $53,333, representing the pro rata share of the bonus that would have otherwise been payable to Mr. Mullen, on the next bonus payment date in satisfaction of the personal goal component of his bonus. However, because the performance metrics for the personal goal component of Mr. Mullen's bonus were not satisfied, Mr. Mullen did not receive the $53,333 bonus payment. The Company also pays the premiums for Mr. Mullen's continued coverage under the Company's group medical, dental and prescription coverage for up to 12 months following the Mullen Effective Date. In addition, on the Mullen Effective Date and pursuant to the terms of applicable award agreements, 75,000 shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. Mullen on August 17, 2007 (25,000 shares) and August 15, 2008 (50,000 shares) vested in full.

        Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Mullen agreed to provide consulting services to our board of directors for a period of nine months following the Mullen Effective Date. During the consulting term, Mr. Mullen is required to provide no more than 20% of the average level of bona fide services performed by him during the 36-month period immediately preceding the date of the Separation Agreement, August 11, 2010. In exchange for such consulting services, the Company pays Mr. Mullen a monthly fee of $9,333 during the consulting term.

24

Table of Contents

        Stephen E. Carley.    Mr. Carley was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer and entered into an employment agreement with the Company effective September 13, 2010. Mr. Carley's employment agreement is for an indefinite term, subject to termination in accordance with its terms, described below. His employment agreement provides for, among other things, the following:

•

a starting base salary of $700,000 annually, subject to certain adjustments from time to time as determined by the Board;



•

a signing bonus of $550,000;



•

a target annual bonus of 100% of base salary, based on the satisfaction of certain performance targets to be determined by the Board and annual equity awards, which are contingent on the attainment of certain performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee;



•

equity grants on the effective date, which have been granted, of (a) performance-based restricted stock units having a target value of $400,000, (b) non-qualified stock options having a grant date fair value of $550,000, and (c) 20,000 time-vested restricted stock units;



•

certain other benefits, including an annual car allowance, reimbursement of legal fees incurred by Mr. Carley in connection with the negotiation of the Employment Agreement, and the right to participate in all savings, retirement, medical, welfare and insurance plans and programs to the same extent as other senior executive employees of the Company; and



•

reimbursement of certain relocation expenses incurred by Mr. Carley in an amount not to exceed $425,000 including without limitation, brokerage commissions on the sale of his existing home, moving expenses, an interim housing allowance, and a tax gross-up for such relocation expenses.

        The compensation committee determined Mr. Carley's compensation with the assistance of the executive search firm that conducted a search for a new chief executive officer in 2010. Certain elements were based on the recommendations of the search firm with respect to CEO compensation, modified to compensate Mr. Carley for any compensation he would lose and expenses incurred in transitioning from his previous position to our Company. Mr. Carley's cash signing bonus was intended principally to replace his bonus that he would have expected to earn had he remained employed with his former company. The equity grants received by Mr. Carley were determined with advice of F.W. Cook & Co., Inc., the compensation committee's former compensation consultant. The amounts generally reflect the median annual award for a chief executive officer at a restaurant company with a market cap similar to ours.

25

Table of Contents

        The employment agreement provides that Mr. Carley is entitled to receive certain benefits upon termination of his employment as set forth in the chart below.

        The employment agreement contains confidentiality, non-compete and non-interference covenants from Mr. Carley, including a 12-month covenant not to compete with the Company and its subsidiaries in the casual dining restaurant business; provided that, the non-compete covenant extends for a period of 24-months with respect to certain competitors of the Company and any "fast casual" burger concept.

        Other Executives.    Jonathon James, Senior Vice President of Enterprise Services, resigned from the Company in September 2010. Mr. James, who was hired in September 2009, would have been included as a named executive officer in 2010 due to his total compensation received but was not a named executive in 2009. Upon his departure, Mr. James entered into an agreement with us to provide consulting services for a period of six months through March 2, 2011 to assist in effecting the transition, due to his resignation, of the oversight of the Purchasing, Human Resources, Information Technology, NRO, and Training departments. During Mr. James' consulting term, the Company paid Mr. James approximately $16,666 per month, plus certain amounts to pay applicable income and other taxes. Prior to his employment with the Company, between 2006 and 2009 Mr. James was a managing partner with an executive leadership and management consulting firm that provided services to the Company. In connection with his employment with the Company, Mr. James terminated his interests in the consulting firm.

26

Table of Contents

Summary of 2011 Compensation Activity

        Following the appointment of Steve Carley as our chief executive officer in September 2010, we developed a strategic plan to deliver strong, sustainable, best-in-class improvement in our operating and financial performance. The compensation committee took several actions to strengthen the pay-for-performance orientation of our executive compensation programs and to reinforce the link between the interests of our executive officers and those of our shareholders. These actions are designed to elevate the performance of our executive team, reinforce annual operating excellence and better align our performance with positive returns and long-term value creation for our shareholders.

        Compensation Consultant and Benchmarking.    In 2011, the compensation committee retained a new executive compensation advisor, AON Hewitt, to take a fresh look at our compensation programs. AON Hewitt replaced the compensation committee's former consultant, F.W. Cook & Co., Inc., who had served for several years as the committee's outside advisor. AON Hewitt will annually review our executive compensation program and broad-based equity compensation practices, assist in ongoing development of our executive compensation philosophy, and act as an advisor to the compensation committee on compensation matters as they arise. Other than its service to the compensation committee, AON Hewitt does not provide any services to us as the compensation committee believes that the committee and our management should not use the same advisors.

        Changes to Compensation Program.    Following consultation between the compensation committee and AON Hewitt, we refined our executive compensation philosophy and program to better align with business objectives focused on long-term growth incorporating the following decisions. The components are described in more detail below under Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program.

27

Table of Contents

        In sum, we believe that these changes have brought greater focus to our compensation strategy, sharpened our analytics, better aligned it with the current realities of our business economics and put greater emphasis on annual and long-term performance. We believe that we have set upon a course in which our executive pay plans better align management's interests with our shareholders and that a strong performance foundation has been created upon which we will build in subsequent years.

Elements of our Executive Compensation Program

Overview

        Our executive compensation program consists of the short-term components of annual cash salaries, and annual cash bonuses, and long-term components of equity grants, and, new starting in 2011, a long-term cash incentive. Historically, base salaries have been set at or slightly below the median (50^th percentile) of our peer group of restaurants, with a material component of annual cash compensation derived from performance-based cash bonuses. The annual bonus goals were based on both Company and personal targets. Bonus payout levels were targeted at higher than median to result in total cash compensation above the median up to the 75^th percentile, based on performance.

        In 2011, the compensation committee modified its compensation philosophy to target base salaries and annual bonus compensation at the median of our peer group, with emphasis on the long-term creation of value, compensated at the level of the 65^th percentile. The long-term component is

28

Table of Contents

comprised of a cash incentive, option and restricted stock unit grants, as described below under "Long-Term Incentive Program".

Peer Group Modifications

        In connection with its review of our executive compensation program, AON Hewitt recommended changes to the Company's peer group. The changes were based on similarity in revenue and comparability of the restaurant companies in the peer group to us. Moreover, we will use the same peer group for all comparisons and equity programs. The 2010 peer group consisted of the 13 restaurants identified in the chart below.

        Nine new companies, including some quick-serve companies, were added that in the belief that they cover a broader spectrum of our industry and are more comparable to us in size and scope. Five companies were removed based on either their respective size or other disqualifying factors.

        Accordingly, in 2011, the peer group will be comprised of the restaurant companies listed below as the New Peer Group.

Cash Compensation

        Total cash compensation for executive officers consists of base salary, an annual cash bonus incentive and, new in 2011, a long-term cash incentive. The discussion and tables below include Mr. Mullen and Mr. James, who are included as named executive officers, but who both left the Company in September 2010.

        Base Salary.    Base salaries for our executives are set to recognize the scope of each executive's responsibilities, experience, and performance. Base salaries are generally set at or below the median of the market with the upside potential based on bonus opportunity. However, Mr. Mullen's 2010 salary following his salary adjustment was above the median.

29

Table of Contents

        Base salaries are reviewed annually, and are adjusted from time to time to account for the criteria set forth above, other relevant factors and to realign salaries with market levels based on benchmark data provided by the compensation consultant. The compensation committee also considers the CEO's evaluation of each executive's performance and recommendations. No salary increases were recommended for the executive officers in 2010 based on factors including the Company's performance and the macroeconomic environment. For 2011, no salary decisions have yet been made.

        Other than Mr. Carley, none of our current executive officers has an employment agreement. We offer to our named executive officers and certain others the option to defer all or a portion of their base salaries under the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan, discussed below.

        Annual Performance-Based Incentive (Cash Bonus).    Our executive compensation program includes annual performance-based bonuses, which are intended to reward achievement of short-term operating goals and financial performance that incrementally support long-term, sustained creation of stockholder value. Each of our executives is eligible to receive a cash bonus based on achievement of certain performance objectives. The performance objectives include achievement by the Company of a financial metric, which historically has been annual EBITDA, and attainment of individual performance goals set each year. The compensation committee approves Company bonus targets based on a sliding scale of minimum, target and maximum level defined financial objectives and approves payout of the bonuses. These bonuses are paid pursuant to the Company's 2007 Plan.

        The EBITDA measure was selected because we believe it best captures our operating results without reflecting the impact of decisions related to our growth, non-operating factors and other matters. While the EBITDA objectives are not modified once established, the compensation committee may adjust, in its discretion, EBITDA results for non-cash, non-recurring or unusual items. In addition, the compensation committee may grant special bonuses on an individual or group basis in recognition of extraordinary achievements or to address other special situations, and may also reduce bonus amounts if pre-established personal goals, when applicable, are not met. Receipt of bonus awards may be deferred under our Deferred Compensation Plan.

        2010 Bonuses.    Because of the increased emphasis on pay-for-performance in 2010, the compensation committee approved a cash bonus incentive program more heavily weighted toward achievement of Company targets versus personal goals.

        For 2010, executive bonus objectives were based 90% on achievement of Company goals, and 10% on achievement of personal goals, versus a 50/50 split for 2009. The Company component was focused on achievement of certain levels of EBITDA scaled upward from a minimum threshold EBITDA level to a maximum level. Personal goals were aligned with objectives related to continuing to implement and execute foundational initiatives that support steady, sustainable improvement in operations; return on capital; guest counts increases; controlling labor, food, restaurant opening and development costs; and improving financial strength and corporate governance, among others. The rationale to increase the mix to 90/10 was to focus objectives on improving current results while creating the foundations for sustained improved performance and shareholder value. The compensation committee reviews the performance of the Company and the executives against the respective goals to determine whether to approve bonus payouts.

        For 2010, our target level EBITDA objective was approximately $96.6 million before giving effect to bonus payments. The range of EBITDA objectives was approximately 90% of target for the minimum threshold level, and approximately 105% above target for the maximum level. Our actual EBITDA for 2010 fell below the minimum threshold level. Consequently, no EBITDA-based bonuses were paid to any of the named executive officers for the fiscal year, or to any of the other eligible employee, including certain other executives, regional management and non-restaurant personnel.

30

Table of Contents

        In fiscal 2010, the Company did achieve several operational and profitability objectives. Each named executive officer's 2010 personal goals shared one or more common components in alignment with these objectives, and accordingly each executive earned a bonus payout on achievement of certain of these goals, as reflected in the summary compensation table. The 2010 achievements included:

•

Reduced supply chain costs by reducing the number of distribution centers that supply our restaurants from 36 to 13;



•

Expanded our full-year 2010 gift card sales to $27.5 million or an increase of 22% over prior year;



•

Began to see improved sales year over year in the fourth quarter with an 0.8% increase in comparable store sales compared to a decrease of 10.5% in the prior year;



•

Sustained improved average weekly sales for our 13 non-comparable restaurants of $65,610 during the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to $49,167 for our 29 non-comp restaurants a year ago;



•

Opened 11 new company-owned restaurants in 2010 funded by our operating cash flow; and



•

Paid down debt of $38 million during fiscal 2010 from free cash flow to a debt balance of $158.5 million cash at fiscal 2010 year end from $191.3 million at fiscal 2009 year end.

        The table below illustrates each named executive officer's bonus eligibility had the EBITDA targets been achieved in addition to the named executive officer's personal goals. The percentages set forth below represent the percentage of the executive's salary that would be received as a bonus at the applicable level. For example, the total target level bonus for a senior vice president is 70% of salary. Accordingly, the company performance portion of 90% of the total 70% is 63%, calculated at the Target EBITDA level; the personal portion is 7%. Mr. Carley did not participate in the 2010 bonus program.

        2011 Bonus Targets.    For 2011, all annual bonuses will be based solely on achievement of an annual Company EBITDA target in order to underscore our sense of urgency on improving performance and maximizing shareholder returns. The compensation committee may include a personal goal component or use other measures in future years. Management has developed a strategic plan and identified opportunities in these areas which will be implemented through a group of initiatives that we refer to as "Project RED," which stands for Revenue Growth, Expense Management, and Deployment of Capital. The success of these initiatives, some of which are long-term in nature, and their impact on our EBITDA target, will be evaluated by the compensation committee in determining bonus payouts.

        As in prior years, there is a range of bonus payout opportunity based on minimum, target and maximum EBITDA achievement. The table below illustrates bonus eligibility based on potential 2011

31

Table of Contents

results for achievement of EBITDA goals. The percentages set forth below are percentages of the executive's salary:

Long-Term Incentive Program

        We believe that equity-based compensation aligns executives with long-term improvement in the Company's performance and stockholder interests. Historically, we have used options, restricted stock and restricted stock units as components of our equity incentive plan. The compensation committee believes that a mix of restricted stock and/or restricted stock units and options provides an element of guaranteed equity ownership but also maintains an element of performance risk for executives, and aligns their interests with our shareholders. The compensation committee determines the annual grants for the executive officers, including the named executive officers, pursuant to market data and with respect to comparisons to Peer Restaurant compensation practices. With AON Hewitt's assistance, the compensation committee has revised the long-term incentive program for 2011 to emphasize the long-term performance component. This component consists of a mix of options, time-based restricted units and long-term cash award, all as described below under "2011 Long-term Incentive Program." Together with the annual incentive, which is performance oriented based on annual Company EBITDA targets, the long-term incentives place a large portion of the executives pay at risk. The portion of variable pay for Mr. Carley is 71% and for all other named executives, the variable pay is approximately 58%.

32

Table of Contents

        2010 Equity Grants.    In February 2010, the Company made annual equity grants to our named executive officers, in the form of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units granted under the 2007 Plan. The purpose of this change from 2009 was to increase the performance orientation of the program and ensure that more than 50% of named executive officer equity awards were performance based. The named executive officers were granted the following awards:

33

Table of Contents

        The time-based restricted stock units vest in four equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date so long as the executive is employed or otherwise providing services to the Company on each vesting date. The performance-based restricted stock units are based on the Company's relative Total Shareholder Return ranking versus a defined group of 42 similarly sized restaurant chains over a three-year performance period ("TSR RSU"). This design was to objectively align executive officers' equity incentive rewards with long-term stockholder returns. The total shareholder return measure ensures that participants are compensated when the return to our stockholders exceeds that of these peer group companies, since a simple stock price growth measure may reward increases in the Company's stock price due to improvements in general economic conditions that are experienced by all companies in the peer group. No awards vest until the performance period is complete (excluding exceptions related to death, disability and change-in-control), and the number of shares that vest under all termination scenarios is related to actual relative TSR performance versus the comparison set. The number of TSR RSUs earned on the last day of the three-year performance period will be determined as follows:

        Although this program will continue through its termination in 2013, no further grants will be made under this program. The compensation committee believes that the performance orientation of the newly designed long term incentive program is increased by the use of more stock options and instituting the cash performance plan, and lowering the use of restricted shares.

        2011 Long-Term Incentive Program.    The compensation committee is implementing a new long-term incentive ("LTI") plan for the performance cycle beginning 2011 through 2013. The new program will be comprised of three elements, long-term cash incentive, which will constitute 40% of an executive's total long-term compensation opportunity, stock options representing another 40% and 20% in restricted stock units. It currently is intended that this program will continue annually in overlapping cycles.

        The LTI total target amount is based on the same percentage of the executive's salary on which the annual bonus payout is calculated. Historically, stock options we have granted vest fully in four years with one quarter vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and 1/36^th ratably over the following 36 months. Full value awards have historically vested ratably over four years on each anniversary of the grant date.

        The long-term cash portion of the revised performance plan is focused on operational metrics with a three-year performance period. The awards will cliff vest at the end of each three-year performance cycle. Each subsequent annual plan will have similar three-year performance periods and vesting. Performance will be measured over the three years at a threshold, target and maximum level. There will be two independent metrics used which achieves a balance between growth in enterprise value and profitability. The first metric is the three-year average return on invested capital (ROIC), which recognizes that uses of capital and improvement in ROIC may take time to manifest. The second metric is cumulative EBITDA, which allows progress toward the goal to be measured during the three years. The goals are equally weighted and the payouts may be different depending on the achievement

34

Table of Contents

level of each metric. These metrics were chosen to assure an appropriate balance between growth and efficiency in our enterprise value and our operations.

        To date, no equity awards have been granted, in part because there are insufficient full value awards available under the 2007 Plan. The Company has asked in this proxy statement that the shareholders approve an increase in the number of shares in the 2007 Plan available for grant. It is expected that, if the amendment is approved, initial equity grants would be made during the second quarter of 2011. If the amendment to the 2007 Plan is not approved, the compensation committee may adjust the long-term incentive program. See Proposal 4, APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN.

        Stock Ownership Guidelines.    In March 2009, the compensation committee approved stock ownership guidelines for the Company's executive officers and directors (see page 49 for the ownership guidelines for directors). The compensation committee believes that executive ownership requirements increase alignment with stockholders on long-term ownership risk. For executives, the guidelines require holding a definitive dollar amount of stock, valued based on the price of the Company's common stock at the date of acquisition, during the term of the executive's employment. The value is based broadly on a multiple of salary for each executive officer. The executive officers have five years to achieve the guidelines. The compensation committee periodically reviews the guidelines and receives guidance and market data periodically from its advisors. The ownership values are approximately 3.5 times Mr. Carley's salary, approximately two times Mr. Houseman's salary and approximately 1.5 times salary for the remaining executive officers, whose guidelines are the same, given that historically other equity grants have been equal among them. The following table illustrates the ownership guidelines and the acquisition value of the named executive officers' holdings as of March 31, 2010:

Change in Control Arrangements

        The Company has change in control agreements with each of the named executive officers other than Mr. Mullen whose employment agreements included change in control provisions and Mr. Carley whose current employment agreement includes change in control provisions. The compensation committee's philosophy in considering change of control agreements was its belief that the best interests of the Company are supported when management can continue to perform and consider business combination transactions without the distraction of personal employment considerations. Cook, the committee's former compensation adviser, evaluated other compensation arrangements and indicated that almost all of the Peer Restaurants include change in control agreements as part of their executive compensation. The compensation committee also believed it served the best interest of the Company to implement these arrangements outside of any pending transactions.

        The change in control agreements of the named executive officers other than Mr. Carley provide that if the executive resigns for good reason or is terminated by the Company other than for cause or disability or other than as a result of the executive's death during the 18-month period following a

35

Table of Contents

change in control, the executive is entitled to receive the following payments and benefits, except that Mr. Houseman is entitled to the payments described in the paragraph below:

•

continued payment, for a period consisting of twelve months following the effective date of termination, of his or her base salary as in effect immediately prior to the date of termination;



•

one times the annual bonus amount earned for his or her performance in the last completed calendar year prior to the change in control; and



•

payment or reimbursement of the cost of continuing coverage for the executive and his or her spouse under the Company's then existing medical, dental and prescription insurance plans for the twelve-month period following the effective date of termination or the remainder of the existing employment period.

        The primary differences between the change in control agreement with Mr. Houseman and the change in control agreements with the other named executive officers (not including Mr. Carley) is that Mr. Houseman's agreement provides for a severance payment equal to two times his annual compensation as compared to one times annual compensation and payment for benefits for twenty-four months rather than twelve months. In addition, Mr. Houseman's agreement provides for a gross-up payment for Internal Revenue Code Section 280G purposes on the terms and conditions set forth in his agreement.

        The definition of change in control is substantially similar to the definition contained in the 2007 Plan, as discussed below. Good reason is defined as a reduction in the executive's compensation, relocation of the Company's headquarters to a location more than 20 miles from the existing location, a significant reduction in the then-effective responsibilities of the executive without the executive's prior written consent (for this purpose, if the Company ceases to be a publicly-traded corporation, the executive will not be deemed to have suffered such a reduction in the nature and scope of his or her responsibilities solely because of the change in the nature and scope thereof resulting from the Company no longer being publicly-traded), or failure by the Company to obtain the assumption of the obligations contained in the change in control agreement by any successor to the Company. The agreements also contain standard confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

        Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 limits the deductibility for tax purposes of compensation over $1 million paid by a company to an executive officer. The policy of the compensation committee is to establish and maintain a compensation program that maximizes the creation of long-term stockholder value. The compensation committee attempts to generally structure most compensation approaches to ensure deductibility. The compensation committee, however, reserves the right to adopt programs giving consideration to factors other than deductibility where the compensation committee believes stockholder interests are best served by retaining flexibility. In such cases, the compensation committee may consider various alternatives to preserving the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits to the extent reasonably practicable and to the extent consistent with its compensation objectives.

        As discussed above, performance bonuses are generally paid under the 2007 Plan and thus, are intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, such amounts are deductible by the Company even if in excess of the $1 million statutory limit. Certain of our annual equity awards to our executives are not performance-based. Consequently, a portion of that compensation may not be deductible in future years if such executive's aggregate compensation is in excess of statutory limits.

36

Table of Contents

Risk Mitigation

        The compensation committee considers, in establishing and reviewing our executive compensation program, whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk taking. The factors considered by the committee include:

•

The general design philosophy of our compensation policies and practices for employees whose behavior would be most affected by the incentives established by our compensation policies and practices, as such policies and practices relate to or affect risk taking by employees on our behalf, and the manner of their implementation;



•

Our risk assessment and incentive considerations in structuring our compensation policies and practices or in awarding and paying compensation;



•

How our compensation policies and practices relate to the realization of risks resulting from the actions of employees in both the short term and the long term;



•

Our policies regarding adjustments to our compensation programs and practices to address changes in our risk profile; and



•

Material adjustments that we have made to our compensation policies and practices as a result of changes in our risk profile.

        The compensation committee believes that it has mitigated unnecessary risk taking in both the design of the compensation plans and the controls placed upon them because (i) payments under all of our management compensation plans are capped, (ii) the performance goals relate directly to the business plan approved by the board of directors and (iii) there is an appropriate balance between our annual operating achievements and longer-term value creation, with a particular emphasis on longer term value creation for our executives.

Compensation Committee Report

        The following Report of the compensation committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report.

        The compensation committee, comprised of independent directors, reviewed and discussed the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company's management. Based on the review and discussions, the compensation committee recommended to the Company's board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

37

Table of Contents

2010 Executive Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth summary information concerning compensation awarded to, earned by, or accrued for services rendered to the Company in all capacities by our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of fiscal year 2010, as well as our former chief executive officer and one additional former executive officer (collectively, the named executive officers), for fiscal years 2008 through 2010:

38

Table of Contents