Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003

For the transition period from             to             

Commission file number 0-49916

RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(303) 846-6000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (based on the closing price on the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter on The Nasdaq Stock Market’s National Market) was $195.1 million. All executive officers and directors of the registrant and all persons filing a Schedule 13D with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registrant’s common stock have been deemed, solely for the purpose of the foregoing calculation, to be “affiliates” of the registrant.

There were 15,998,632 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 10, 2004.

Certain information required for Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders.

Table of Contents

RED ROBIN GOURMET BURGERS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. Business

Overview

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a casual dining restaurant chain focused on serving an imaginative selection of high quality gourmet burgers in a family-friendly atmosphere. Unless otherwise provided in this annual report on Form 10-K, references to “Red Robin,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. Red Robin currently owns and operates 118 restaurants in 14 states, with an additional 107 restaurants operating under franchise or license agreements in 22 states and two Canadian provinces.

Our menu features our signature product, the gourmet burger, which we make from beef, chicken, veggie, pot roast, pork, fish and turkey and serve in a variety of recipes. We offer a wide selection of toppings for our gourmet burgers, including fresh guacamole, roasted green chilies, honey mustard dressing, grilled pineapple, crispy onion straws, sautéed mushrooms and a choice of six different cheeses. In addition to our gourmet burgers, which accounted for approximately 45.4% of our total food sales in 2003, we also serve an array of other food items that are designed to appeal to a broad group of guests, including salads, soups, appetizers, other entrees such as carnitas fajitas and pastas, desserts and our signature Mad Mixology^® alcoholic and non-alcoholic specialty beverages.

Our restaurants are designed to create a fun and memorable dining experience in a family-friendly atmosphere and provide our guests with an exceptional dining value. Our concept attracts a broad guest base by appealing to the entire family, particularly women, teens, kids ages eight to 12 whom we refer to as tweens, and other children. Our mascot “Red” appeals to toddlers, and our carousel horses, televisions in the floors, three dimensional art and humorous posters appeal to children of all ages. We believe that our quick meal preparation, upbeat, popular music and enthusiastic team members enable us to achieve high sales productivity and create a sense of activity and excitement. All of our menu items are designed to be delivered to guests in a time-efficient manner, and we have a per person average check of approximately $10.00, including beverages.

To increase guest traffic, we locate our restaurants near high activity areas, such as regional malls, lifestyle centers, big box shopping centers and entertainment centers. We believe that women, teens and tweens are extremely attractive consumers to real estate developers in these types of locations as they often strive to attract a similar consumer base to ours. We further believe that these individuals are the primary visitors to the high activity areas where our restaurants are located and are predominantly responsible for family dining decisions. Data from an independent source indicates that in 2001 approximately 28.0% of our guests are in the highly desirable under 18 consumer segment, which compared to 20.0% in the major casual dining bar and grill chains. According to a survey we conducted in 2001, approximately 57.0% of our guests are females. We believe our unique guest demographic mix provides us with a competitive advantage over other casual dining chains, enhancing our ability to enter into real estate locations favorable to us.

We believe that the appeal of our imaginative, high quality product offerings, our fun, family-friendly atmosphere, and our ability to operate in a wide variety of real estate formats and geographic locations have created an attractive restaurant model, providing us with significant opportunities for continued growth through both new company-owned and franchised restaurants.

History

The first Red Robin^® restaurant was opened in Seattle, Washington in September 1969. In 1979, the first franchised Red Robin^® restaurant was opened in Yakima, Washington by Mike Snyder and his brother. Mike Snyder subsequently became our president and chief operating officer in 1996, and was elected chief executive officer in 1997. In 2000, we completed a series of financing transactions that helped position our company for future growth. At that time, we acquired The Snyder Group, a 14-restaurant franchise company owned by Mike Snyder, in exchange for equity, cash and notes. In addition, Quad-C, a private equity firm whose principals have substantial experience in the restaurant industry, made an equity investment of $25.0 million in our company through its affiliates. As a result of these two transactions, Quad-C became our largest stockholder and Mike Snyder acquired a

1

Table of Contents

significant equity interest in our company. In January 2001, our management formed Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to facilitate a reorganization of the company. The reorganization was consummated in August 2001, and since that time, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. has owned all of the outstanding capital stock of Red Robin International, Inc., and our other operating subsidiaries through which our company-owned restaurants are operated.

Concept and business strategy

Our objective is to be the leading gourmet burger and casual dining restaurant destination. To achieve our objective, we have developed the following strategies.

2

Table of Contents

We believe these and other lifestyle and demographic trends will continue to be favorable to us and offer us strong opportunities for future restaurant expansion.

Unit level economics

In 2003, our comparable company-owned restaurants generated average sales of just over $3.0 million. The average cash investment cost for our free-standing restaurants opened in 2003 was $2.0 million, excluding pre-opening costs, which averaged $178,600 per restaurant, and land.

Our existing restaurants range in size from 3,800 square feet to 10,700 square feet. Our prototype restaurant is typically a free-standing building with approximately 6,350 square feet, approximately 200 seats and a patio. Based on this prototype, we expect that our average cash investment cost for our free-standing restaurants in 2004 will be $2.1 million, excluding pre-opening costs, which we estimate will average $187,000 per restaurant, and land.

Expansion strategy and site selection

We are pursuing a disciplined growth strategy that includes the addition of company-owned and franchised restaurants. Our restaurant expansion strategy focuses primarily on further penetrating existing markets with a cluster strategy and selectively entering into new markets. We believe this clustering strategy enables us to gain operating efficiencies, increase brand awareness and enhance convenience and ease of access for our guests, all of which we believe leads to significant repeat business. For example, clustering enables us to reduce costs associated with regional supervision of restaurant operations. We also believe this approach reduces the risks involved with opening new restaurants given that we better understand the competitive conditions, consumer tastes, demographics and discretionary spending patterns in our existing markets. In addition, our ability to hire qualified team members is enhanced in markets in which our brand is well known.

We believe that our site selection strategy is critical to our success and we devote substantial time and effort to evaluating each site. Our site selection criteria focus on identifying markets, trade areas and other specific sites that are likely to yield the greatest density of desirable demographic characteristics, heavy retail traffic and a highly visible site.

3

Table of Contents

In order to maximize our market penetration potential, we have developed a flexible physical site format that allows us to operate in a range of real estate venues located near high activity areas such as regional malls, lifestyle centers, big box shopping centers and entertainment centers. Approved sites generally have a population of at least 70,000 people within a three-mile radius and at least 100,000 people within a five-mile radius. Sites generally require a strong daytime and evening population, adequate parking and a visible and easy entrance and exit.

Our real estate team focuses on site selection and future development and each prospective site is thoroughly analyzed before a lease or purchase agreement is signed. Prior to committing to a restaurant site, the site is thoroughly evaluated, visited and approved by our senior management team. Our chief executive officer and/or our chief financial officer personally visit and approve all new sites.

With the exception of the 16 sites for which we own the real estate, we operate our restaurants under leases. Our primary site objective is to secure a suitable site, with the decision to buy or lease as a secondary objective. We believe that our unique guest demographic mix provides us with a major competitive advantage in securing sites. Our long-standing relationships with several major retail developers and owners and our favorable demographics afford us the opportunity to negotiate additional sites in their new developments.

Restaurant locations

We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our concept and brand on a nationwide basis, and we continue to believe that our concept and brand can support as many as 820 additional company-owned or franchised restaurants throughout the United States.

In 2003, we opened 18 new company-owned restaurants and assumed operations of one existing franchise restaurant. In 2004, we expect to open 20 to 22 new company-owned restaurants. In 2003, our franchisees opened ten new restaurants, and we believe our franchisees will open an additional 15 to 17 new franchise restaurants in 2004.

We currently have 118 company-owned restaurants and 107 franchised restaurants in 27 states and two Canadian provinces as shown in the table below:

4

Table of Contents

Menu

Our menu features our signature product, the gourmet burger, which we define as “anything that can go in, on or between two buns.” We make our gourmet burgers from beef, chicken, veggie, pot roast, pork, fish and turkey, and serve them in a variety of recipes. We offer a wide selection of toppings for our gourmet burgers, including fresh guacamole, roasted green chilies, honey mustard dressing, grilled pineapple, crispy onion straws, sautéed mushrooms and a choice of six different cheeses. For example, one of our signature creations, the Banzai Burger, is marinated in teriyaki and topped with grilled pineapple, cheddar cheese, lettuce, tomato and mayonnaise.

In addition to gourmet burgers, which accounted for approximately 45.4% of our total food sales in 2003, we serve an array of other food items that are designed to appeal to a broad group of guests, including a variety of salads, soups, appetizers, other entrees such as carnitas fajitas, pastas and desserts. One of our top selling non-burger menu items is the Crispy Chicken Tender Salad, which features crisp greens topped with lightly fried chicken breast, hard-boiled egg, diced tomato, cheddar cheese, bacon bits and green onion served with house bread and a choice of dressing. We serve all of our burgers and sandwiches with “bottomless” french fries. Our guests can also choose from a wide variety of beverages, including Pepsi products, smoothies, monster milkshakes, our proprietary Strawberry Ecstasy and our signature Mad Mixology^® alcoholic and non-alcoholic specialty beverages, including our Freckled Lemonade.

All of our menu items are prepared to order in our restaurants. The food items currently on our menu range in price from $2.99 to $11.99, with a per person average check of approximately $10.00, including beverages. Sales of alcoholic beverages represented approximately 8.2% and sales of non-alcoholic beverages represented 13.2% of total restaurant sales in 2003.

We continuously experiment with food and beverage items and flavor combinations to create selections that are imaginative and exciting to our guests. Ideas for new menu items are generated at the restaurant level as well as through consumer research and franchisees. Menu items are rotated on and off the menu based on the changing tastes of our guests. Every new recipe idea goes through our test menu development process. The proposed menu item must appeal to a sufficient number of guests and require a preparation time of less than eight minutes to be added to our menu. In addition, the corresponding ingredients must retain or improve the overall menu quality while meeting our gross profit margin targets. All new menu items are then test marketed for eight to 12 weeks in selected restaurants. Our franchisees are given the opportunity to review proposed menu items and offer feedback before the recipes are finalized and added to the menu.

Guest loyalty and experience

Through our unique guest service philosophy, which we describe as “unbridled,” we feel we have created a culture that has enabled us to build a strong and loyal guest base. Unbridled acts are common in our company, as our team members have a history of going far beyond the customary level of guest service. In 2002, we were proud to be recognized as a gold winner of Restaurants & Institutions 2002 Choice in Chains Award for excellence in customer service, food quality and overall dining experience, as voted on by a nationally representative sample of consumers.

We use many industry standard techniques to measure our guests’ experiences at our restaurants. These include comment cards, mystery shoppers, internet feedback, market area and in-restaurant consumer research. We also employ several additional techniques at the restaurant level, including a “systems check” performed each week by our general managers to track and measure our guests’ experiences. This “systems check” evaluates our speed of service, our food preparation times and our seating utilization for each week. The key measurement criteria

5

Table of Contents

evaluated in our “systems check” contribute to our ability to give our guests the “gift of time.” We strive to provide guests with a 37-minute dining experience at lunch and a 42-minute experience at dinner. Our regional operations directors utilize these and other reports to determine which restaurants in their region may need additional support to address any problems.

Marketing and advertising

During 2003, we spent an aggregate of 3.2% of restaurant sales on marketing efforts. Of this amount, we spent 0.7% of restaurant sales on major media initiatives such as television commercials, radio advertisements and free-standing inserts in newspapers and other print media. We expect to continue investing a similar percentage of restaurant sales in marketing efforts in the future, primarily in connection with driving comparable restaurant sales and new restaurant openings.

Our marketing strategy focuses on: 1) driving comparable restaurant sales through attracting new guests and increasing the frequency of visits by current guests; 2) supporting new restaurant openings to achieve their sales and profit goals; and 3) communicating a unique, powerful, and consistent brand. We accomplish these objectives through four major marketing initiatives.

In-restaurant marketing

We spend a significant portion of our marketing funds communicating with our guests while they are in our restaurants. The core of our strategy revolves around keeping our menu items fresh, with innovative gourmet burgers and other offerings. Three times per year we promote at least one new burger and one new non-burger item. These items are featured along with one of our gourmet beef burgers on table tents and other printed materials throughout our restaurants. This strategy focuses on highlighting both our core menu burgers along with new burgers and other food items and beverages. The goal is to create variety and excitement for our guests, which we believe drives frequency of visits.

New restaurant openings

We use new restaurant openings as opportunities to reach out to the local media. Our openings are often featured on live local radio broadcasts and receive coverage in local newspapers. We employ a variety of marketing techniques in connection with our new restaurant openings, including community “VIP” parties, with invitations to media personalities and community leaders. We also typically tie our openings to a charitable event.

Local restaurant marketing

We believe we are a wholesome, values-focused leader in family casual dining. With our focus on women, teens and tweens, we have a unique opportunity to market our restaurants locally. We reach out to schools, churches, charities, and community organizations to build brand awareness within the communities that we serve.

Advertising

Although our restaurant concept is not media driven, we do spend a limited amount of our marketing dollars in select markets on various media advertising, including radio, free-standing newspaper inserts and other print media and outdoor billboards and other signage to build brand awareness. Our media advertisements emphasize our gourmet burger passion and showcase key gourmet burgers. We also build and reinforce our brand in all internal and external visual advertising by highlighting the distinctive features of our red, black and yellow logo.

6

Table of Contents

Operations

Restaurant management

Our restaurant operations are divided into four distinct geographic regions, which are overseen by a senior regional operations director who reports to our vice president of restaurant operations. In general, each geographic region contains three to four regional operations directors, one to two regional recruiters, a regional training manager and one to two regional kitchen managers. Our regional directors oversee five to eight company-owned restaurants each, which we believe enables them to better support the general managers and achieve sales and cash flow targets for each restaurant within their region. In addition, the regional operations directors invest up to 10% of their time on franchised operations in their respective regions.

Our typical restaurant management team consists of a general manager, an assistant general manager, a kitchen manager and one or two assistant managers. Most of our restaurants employ approximately 85 hourly team members, many of whom work part-time. The general manager of each restaurant is responsible for the day-to-day operation of that restaurant, including hiring, training and development of team members, as well as operating results. The kitchen manager is responsible for product quality, daily production, shift execution, food costs and kitchen labor costs. Our restaurants are generally open Sunday through Thursday from 11:00 AM until 10:00 PM and on Friday and Saturday from 11:00 AM to 11:00 PM.

Operational tools and programs

We utilize a customized food and beverage analysis program that determines the optimal food and beverage costs for each restaurant and provides additional tools and reports to help us identify opportunities, such as waste management, which we believe affords us lower than industry average food and beverage costs. We also utilize a labor program to determine the optimal staffing needs of each restaurant based on its actual guest flow and demand.

We employ several additional operational tools, for example, each week every general manager performs a “systems check” which tracks and measures our guests’ experiences based upon key criteria. This “systems check” evaluates our speed of service, our food preparation times and our seating utilization for each week. Our regional operations directors utilize these and other reports to determine which restaurants in their region may need additional support to address any problems.

Training

We strive to maintain quality and consistency in each of our restaurants through the careful training and supervision of team members and the establishment of, and adherence to, high standards relating to personnel performance, food and beverage preparation and maintenance of our restaurants. Each location has eight to ten certified trainers who provide classroom and on-the-job instruction for new team members. All of our trainers participate in an eight-hour training seminar on good training skills, which provides them with knowledge and tactics to enable them to be better trainers and coaches. We provide all new team members with complete orientation and one-on-one training for their positions to ensure they are able to meet our high standards. All of our new team members are trained by partnering with a certified designated trainer to assure that the training and information they receive is complete and accurate. Team members are certified for their positions by passing a series of tests.

New restaurant managers are required to complete an eight-week training program that includes service, kitchen and management responsibilities. Newly trained managers are then assigned to their home restaurant where they spend one additional training week with their general manager. We place a high priority on our continuing management development programs in order to ensure that qualified managers are available for our future openings. We conduct semi-annual performance reviews with each manager to discuss prior performance and future performance goals. Once a year we hold a general manager conference in which our general managers receive additional training on financial management, food preparation, hospitality and other relevant topics.

When we open a new restaurant, we provide training to team members in each position to ensure the smooth and efficient operation of the restaurant from the first day it opens to the public. Prior to opening a new restaurant, our dedicated training and opening team travels to the location to prepare for an intensive seven-day training

7

Table of Contents

program for all team members hired for the new restaurant opening. Part of the training team stays on-site during the first week of operation and an additional team of training support arrives for on-site support during the second and third weeks. We believe this additional investment in our new restaurants is important, because it helps us provide our guests with a quality dining experience from day one. We also make on-site training teams available when our franchisees open new restaurants. After a restaurant has been opened and is operating smoothly, the general manager supervises the training of new team members.

Recruiting and retention

We seek to hire experienced general managers and team members. We support our team members by offering competitive wages and benefits, including a 401(k) plan, an employee stock purchase plan, medical insurance and stock options for general managers. We motivate and prepare our team members by providing them with opportunities for increased responsibilities and advancement, as well as significant performance-based incentives tied to sales, profitability, certain qualitative measures and length of service at one of our restaurant locations. For example, we provide our general managers with the use of a Jeep Wrangler for two years if they increase restaurant sales in a single restaurant by 15.0% for four consecutive quarters. If this increase is maintained for eight consecutive quarters, we give the manager outright title to the Jeep Wrangler. We also provide various other incentives, including vacations, car allowances and quarterly sales and profit bonuses. Our most successful general managers are eligible for promotion to training general manager status and are entitled to receive more lucrative compensation packages based on various performance criteria. We also provide monetary rewards for general managers who develop future managers for our restaurants.

Restaurant franchise and licensing arrangements

We currently have 23 franchisees that operate 107 restaurants in 22 states and two Canadian provinces. We currently have 17 exclusive franchise development arrangements with our 23 franchisees who are currently operating franchised restaurants. Our two largest franchisees are Red Robin Restaurants of Canada, Ltd., with 20 restaurants throughout Alberta and British Columbia, Canada, and Top Robin Ventures, Inc., with 15 restaurants in Southern California. In 2003, our franchisees opened ten new restaurants and we expect our franchisees to open 15 to 17 additional new restaurants in 2004. The success of our current franchisees and the popularity of our concept have created significant interest by potential franchisees. In 2003, we added four new franchisees who have committed to develop 25 new restaurants in the future.

Each franchise arrangement typically consists of an area development agreement and a separate franchise agreement for each restaurant. Our current form of area development agreement grants exclusive rights to a franchisee to develop a minimum number of restaurants in a defined area, typically over a five-year period. Individual franchise agreements relate to the operation of each restaurant opened and typically have a term of 20 years with a renewal option for an additional ten years if certain conditions are satisfied.

Under our current form of area development agreement, we collect a $10,000 area development fee for each restaurant the franchisee agrees to develop at the time we enter into the area development agreement. When a franchisee opens a new restaurant, we collect an additional franchise fee of $25,000. We may charge lower area development fees and franchise fees for existing franchisees. Area development fees and franchise fees are recognized as income when all material obligations of and initial services to be provided by us have been performed, generally upon the opening of the restaurant. Until earned, these fees are accounted for as deferred income, a liability. Our current form of franchise agreement requires the franchisee to pay a royalty fee equal to 4.0% of adjusted restaurant sales.

Franchisees are required to spend a minimum of 1.5% of adjusted restaurant sales on local advertising or promotional activities and to pay an advertising fee of 0.5% of adjusted restaurant sales to a cooperative advertising fund for marketing studies and the development of commercials or other print and electronic media promotional material. We also have the ability under most of our franchise agreements to require the franchisee to contribute up to 4.0% of adjusted sales to a separate national advertising and marketing fund. The royalty fee and advertising and marketing contributions of our franchisees vary depending on when the agreements were executed and the number of restaurants that the franchisee committed to open during the term of the area development agreement.

8

Table of Contents

Franchise compliance assurance

We have instituted a comprehensive system to ensure the selection of quality franchisees and compliance with our systems and standards, both during the development and operating of franchise restaurants.

To continuously improve our operations, we maintain a franchise marketing advisory council, a franchise business advisory council and a food and beverage committee. The councils provide advice to us regarding operations and consist of three franchisee representatives and three members of our senior management. The food and beverage committee, which is also comprised of three franchisee representatives and three members of our senior management team, helps determine which items are selected for menu testing and which items will be featured in future promotions. In addition, several times each year we solicit feedback and insights on specific topics from the broad group of franchisees and then get together with them to discuss and share their insights. These gatherings are an effort to attain a high level of franchisee buy-in and to assure the system is evolving in a positive direction through the exchange of best practices.

Management information systems

All of our restaurants use computerized management information systems, which are designed to improve operating efficiencies, provide corporate management with timely access to financial and marketing data, and reduce restaurant and corporate administrative time and expense. We believe our management information systems are sophisticated and are sufficient to support our restaurant expansion plans.

With the data provided by our information systems, we can report daily, weekly and period-to-date numbers on an automated daily report that is delivered electronically to our restaurants and our field personnel. On a weekly and a periodic basis, we issue other electronic reports that provide comparative data regarding food, labor and other cost information. Our information systems also enable us to automatically post restaurant-level data, such as restaurant sales, cash and credit card receipts and promotion usage into our corporate accounting software. We also use our information systems to capture information regarding our payroll and the status of new and existing team members. Specifically, we use Menulink, a Windows-based product, to perform our restaurant-level bookkeeping, electronic ordering and food cost and management functions. Our Aloha Technologies point-of-sale system facilitates the supply of data to Menulink and also assists with labor scheduling and credit card authorizations. We have developed several in-house products to assist with our information systems. Our Scheduling Team Members and Reporting System, or STaRs, helps our managers schedule the optimal amount of team members at any time. We believe these systems enable both restaurant-level and corporate-level management to adequately supervise the operational and financial performance of our restaurants as necessary to support our planned expansion.

9

Table of Contents

Food preparation, quality control and purchasing

We believe that we have some of the highest food quality standards in the industry. Our systems are designed to protect our food supply throughout the preparation process. We provide detailed specifications to suppliers for our food ingredients, products and supplies. We inspect specific qualified manufacturers and growers. Our purchasing team and restaurant managers are certified in a comprehensive safety and sanitations course by the National Restaurant Association. Minimum cook temperature requirements and twice-a-day line checks ensure the safety and quality of both burgers and other items we use in our restaurants.

We rely on SYSCO Corporation, a national food distributor, as the primary distributor of our food ingredients, supplies and other products. To maximize our purchasing efficiencies and obtain the lowest possible prices for our ingredients, products and supplies, while maintaining the highest quality, our centralized purchasing team generally negotiates fixed price contracts with terms of between one month and one year or monthly commodity pricing formulas. In order to provide the freshest ingredients and products, and to maximize operating efficiencies between purchase and usage, each restaurant’s kitchen manager determines the restaurant’s daily usage requirements for food ingredients, products and supplies. The kitchen manager orders accordingly from approved local suppliers and our national master distributor and all deliveries are inspected to ensure that the items received meet our quality specifications and negotiated prices. Our current contract with SYSCO ends on June 30, 2004, however, we are negotiating terms for a new agreement that we believe will be formally executed prior to the end of the current agreement. We do not expect that there will be any disruption of service to our restaurants as a result of these negotiations. We believe that competitively priced, high quality alternative manufacturers, suppliers, growers and distributors are available should the need arise.

Team members

As of March 1, 2004, we had just over 11,000 employees, whom we refer to as team members, consisting of approximately 10,900 team members at company-owned restaurants and 135 team members at our corporate headquarters and in our regional offices. During our higher volume summer months, we experience an increase in the number of hourly team members in our restaurants of approximately 10.0%. None of our team members is covered by any collective bargaining agreement. We consider our team member relations to be good.

Competition

The restaurant industry is highly competitive. We compete on the basis of the taste, quality, price of food offered, guest service, ambiance, location and overall dining experience. We believe that our guest demographics, our gourmet burger concept, attractive price-value relationship, and the quality of our food and service enable us to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Although we believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors, many of our direct and indirect competitors are well-established national, regional or local chains, and some have substantially greater financial, marketing, and other resources than we do. We also compete with many other restaurant and retail establishments for site locations and team members.

Trademarks

Our registered trademarks and service marks include, among others, the marks “Red Robin^®,” “America’s Gourmet Burgers & Spirits^®” and “Mad Mixology^®” and our logo. We have registered these marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We have registered or have registrations pending in Canada for our most significant trademarks and service marks. In order to better protect our brand, we have also registered the Internet domain name “www.redrobin.com.” We believe that our trademarks, service marks, and other proprietary rights have significant value and are important to our brand-building efforts and the marketing of our restaurant concepts. We have in the past, and expect to continue to vigorously protect our proprietary rights. We cannot predict, however, whether steps taken by us to protect our proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of these rights or the use by others of restaurant features based upon, or otherwise similar to, our concept. It may be difficult for us to prevent others from copying elements of our concept and any litigation to enforce our rights will likely be costly and may not be successful. Although we believe that we have sufficient rights to all of our trademarks and service marks, we may face claims of infringement that could interfere with our ability to market our restaurants and promote our brand. Any such litigation may be costly and divert resources from our business. Moreover, if we are unable to successfully defend against such claim(s), we may be prevented from using our trademarks and/or service marks in the future and may be liable for damages.

10

Table of Contents

Government regulation

Our restaurants are subject to licensing and regulation by state and local health, safety, fire and other authorities, including licensing and regulation requirements for the sale of alcoholic beverages and food. To date, we have not experienced an inability to obtain or maintain any necessary licenses, permits or approvals, including restaurant, alcoholic beverage and retail licensing. The development and construction of additional restaurants will also be subject to compliance with applicable zoning, land use, and environmental regulations. We are also subject to federal regulation and state laws that regulate the offer and sale of franchises and substantive aspects of a franchisor-franchisee relationship. Various federal and state labor laws govern our relationship with our team members and affect operating costs. These laws include minimum wage requirements, overtime, unemployment tax rates, workers’ compensation rates, citizenship requirements and sales taxes. In addition, the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodations and employment.

Available Information

We maintain a website, http://irpage.com/rrgb/, where we make available, free of charge, our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are providing the address to our website solely for the information of investors. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference herein and our web address is included as an inactive textual reference only.

Executive officers

The following table sets forth information about our executive officers and other key officers as of March 1, 2004:

Michael J. Snyder. Mr. Snyder was elected as our president, chief operating officer and as a director in April 1996. In March 1997, Mr. Snyder was elected as our chief executive officer. In May 1997, Mr. Snyder was elected as our chairman of the board. From 1979 to May 2000, Mr. Snyder also served as president of The Snyder Group Company.

11

Table of Contents

James P. McCloskey. Mr. McCloskey was elected as our chief financial officer and secretary in June 1996. From March 1994 to January 1996, Mr. McCloskey served as chief financial officer for Avalon Software in Tucson, Arizona. From July 1988 to March 1994, Mr. McCloskey served as chief financial officer for Famous Amos Cookies in San Francisco, California.

Michael E. Woods. Mr. Woods joined us in January 1997 as our vice president of franchise development and was appointed senior vice president in January 1999. From 1992 to June 1999, Mr. Woods also served as director of corporate development for The Snyder Group Company.

Robert J. Merullo. Mr. Merullo joined us in April 2000 as our senior vice president of restaurant operations. Mr. Merullo was the director of operations for The Snyder Group Company from November 1991 to April 2000.

Todd A. Brighton. Mr. Brighton joined us in April 2001 as our vice president of development with management responsibility over real estate and design and construction. From August 1999 to April 2001, Mr. Brighton was director of real estate with RTM Restaurant Group and was responsible for strategic analysis and market planning for three restaurant chains. From November 1996 to July 1999, Mr. Brighton was the western development manager for Blockbuster Entertainment, Inc. and was responsible for all real estate development in 17 states and select international markets.

Eric C. Houseman. Mr. Houseman joined us in 1993 and has served as our vice president of restaurant operations since March 2000. From 1993 to March 2000, he served in various regional operations management positions with our company.

G. Dwayne Chambers. Mr. Chambers joined us in August 2003 as our vice president of marketing with responsibility for marketing, advertising, media buying and public relations. From July 1999 to May 2003, Mr. Chambers served as vice president of marketing for Sonic Drive Ins. From May 1987 to June 1999, Mr. Chambers served in various positions including vice president at Moroch and Associates in Dallas, where he directed the agency’s McDonald’s account.

John W. Grant. Mr. Grant joined us in January 1995 as our director of real estate and legal and was promoted to vice president and general counsel in August 1996. From December 1993 to December 1994, Mr. Grant was self-employed as an attorney in Santa Barbara, California.

Jeffrey T. Neely. Mr. Neely joined us in November 2003 as our vice president of franchise operations. From February 2000 to October 2003, Mr. Neely served as senior director of franchise and license operations at Einstein & Noah Bagel Corporation. From September 1989 to January 2000, Mr. Neely served as president and chief executive officer of Domino’s Pizza Neely Enterprises of Wichita.

Charles K. Dusenberry II. Mr. Dusenberry joined us in March 2002 as our vice president of design and construction. From 1996 to March 2002, Mr. Dusenberry was the vice president of construction, design and facilities for Pizzeria Uno.

Robert F. Fix. Mr. Fix joined us in March 2001 as our vice president of franchise sales. From 1996 until March 2001, Mr. Fix was director of U.S. franchise development for Boston Pizza International of Richmond in British Columbia, Canada.

Douglas D. Gammon. Mr. Gammon joined us in November 2003 as our vice president of human resources. From March 1997 to October 2003, Mr. Gammon served as senior vice president of human resources and people development at Taco Cabana, Inc. From December 1989 to March 1997, Mr. Gammon served as vice president of human resources at Marriott International. Mr. Gammon has served as past president for the Council of Hotel and Restaurant Trainers.

12

Table of Contents

Lisa A. Dahl. Ms. Dahl joined us in March 1997 as our corporate controller and was promoted to vice president in January 2003. Prior to joining us, Ms. Dahl was an accounting director for Vicorp Restaurants. Ms. Dahl is a certified public accountant and has served as chairperson for the National Restaurant Association Finance Executive Group.

Robert K. Jakoby. Mr. Jakoby joined us in March 1997 as manager of restaurant systems, was later promoted to director of management information systems and was most recently promoted to vice president of management information systems and chief information officer in January 2004. From May 1993 to March 1997, Mr. Jakoby was store systems project manager for Boston Chicken, Inc. Mr. Jakoby currently serves as chairman of the National Restaurant Association MIS executive study group and also serves on the Nation’s Restaurant News Foodservice Technology Advisory Board.

Ray S. Masters. Mr. Masters joined us in May 1996 as director of purchasing and was promoted to vice president of purchasing in October 1998. Prior to joining us, Mr. Masters held multi-unit national account executive sales positions with SYSCO Foods and Johnsonville Foods.

Scott A. Schooler. Mr. Schooler joined us in April 2000 as vice president of food and beverage. He was the director of food and beverage for The Snyder Group Company from March 1987 to April 2000.

13

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Risks related to our business

Our growth strategy depends on opening new restaurants. Our ability to expand our restaurant base is influenced by factors beyond our control, which may slow restaurant development and expansion and impair our growth strategy.

We are pursuing an aggressive but disciplined growth strategy which, to be successful, will depend in large part on our ability and the ability of our franchisees to open new restaurants and to operate these restaurants on a profitable basis. We anticipate that our new restaurants will generally take several months to reach planned operating levels due to inefficiencies typically associated with new restaurants, including lack of market awareness, the need to hire and train sufficient team members and other factors. We cannot guarantee that we or our franchisees will be able to achieve our expansion goals or that new restaurants will be operated profitably. Further, we cannot assure you that any restaurant we open will obtain operating results similar to those of our existing restaurants. One of our biggest challenges in meeting our growth objectives will be to locate and secure an adequate supply of suitable new restaurant sites. We have experienced delays in opening some of our restaurants and may experience delays in the future. Delays or failures in opening new restaurants could materially and adversely affect our planned growth. The success of our planned expansion will depend upon numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

Our restaurant expansion strategy focuses primarily on further penetrating existing markets. This strategy could cause sales in some of our existing restaurants to decline.

Our areas of highest concentration are California, Colorado, Washington and Oregon. In accordance with our expansion strategy, we intend to open new restaurants primarily in our existing markets. Because we typically draw guests from a relatively small radius around each of our restaurants, the sales performance and guest counts for restaurants near the area in which a new restaurant opens may decline due to the opening of new restaurants.

Our expansion into new markets may present increased risks due to our unfamiliarity with the area.

Some of our new restaurants will be located in areas where we have little or no meaningful experience. Those markets may have different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing markets, which may cause our new restaurants to be less successful than restaurants in our existing markets. An additional risk in expansion into new markets is the lack of market awareness of the Red Robin^® brand. Restaurants opened in new markets may open at lower average weekly sales volumes than restaurants opened in existing markets, and may have higher restaurant-level operating expense ratios than in existing markets. Sales at restaurants opened in new markets may take longer to reach average annual company-owned restaurant sales, if at all, thereby affecting the profitability of these restaurants.

14

Table of Contents

Our expansion may strain our infrastructure and other resources, which could slow our restaurant development or cause other problems.

We face the risk that our existing systems and procedures, restaurant management systems, financial controls, information systems, management resources and human resources will be inadequate to support our planned expansion of company-owned and franchised restaurants. We may not be able to respond on a timely basis to all of the changing demands that our planned expansion will impose on our infrastructure and other resources. If we fail to continue to improve our infrastructure or to manage other factors necessary for us to achieve our expansion objectives, our operating results could be materially negatively affected.

If our franchisees cannot develop or finance new restaurants or build them on suitable sites or open them on schedule, our growth and success may be impeded.

Under our current form of area development agreement, franchisees must develop a predetermined number of restaurants in their area according to a schedule that lasts for the term of their development agreement. Franchisees may not have access to the financial or management resources that they need to open the restaurants required by their development schedules, or be able to find suitable sites on which to develop them. Franchisees may not be able to negotiate acceptable lease or purchase terms for the sites, obtain the necessary permits and government approvals or meet construction schedules. In the past, we have agreed to extend or modify development schedules for certain area developers, and we may do so in the future. Any of these problems could slow our growth and reduce our franchise revenues.

Additionally, our franchisees depend upon financing from banks and other financial institutions in order to construct and open new restaurants. Over the past several years, financing has been difficult to obtain for some small operators. Should these conditions continue, the lack of adequate availability of debt financing could adversely affect the number and rate of new restaurant openings by our franchisees and adversely affect our future franchise revenues.

Our franchisees could take actions that could harm our business.

Franchisees are independent contractors and are not our employees. We provide training and support to franchisees, but the quality of franchised restaurant operations may be diminished by any number of factors beyond our control. Consequently, franchisees may not successfully operate restaurants in a manner consistent with our standards and requirements, or may not hire and train qualified managers and other restaurant personnel. Our image and reputation, and the image and reputation of other franchisees, may suffer materially and system-wide sales could significantly decline if our franchisees do not operate successfully.

The acquisition of existing restaurants from our franchisees may have unanticipated consequences that could harm our business and financial condition.

We may seek to selectively acquire existing restaurants from our franchisees. To do so, we would need to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acceptable acquisition terms and obtain appropriate financing. Any acquisition that we pursue, whether or not successfully completed, may involve risks, including:

Future acquisitions of existing restaurants from our franchisees, which may be accomplished through a cash purchase transaction or the issuance of our equity securities, or a combination of both, could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and impairment charges related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could harm our business and financial condition.

15

Table of Contents

Our operations are susceptible to changes in food availability and cost which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food costs. We rely on SYSCO Corporation, a national food distributor, as the primary distributor of our food ingredients, supplies and other products. Any increase in distribution prices or failure to perform by SYSCO could cause our food costs to increase. There also could be a significant short-term disruption in our supply chain if SYSCO failed to meet our distribution requirements or our relationship was terminated at the end of the contract term on June 30, 2004 or earlier by SYSCO upon breach or material deterioration of our financial position. We are currently negotiating terms for a new agreement with SYSCO, however there are no assurances that we will be able to reach an agreement to continue our relationship with SYSCO on terms similar to our existing contract. Failure to negotiate a new contract with SYSCO could cause disruption of service to our restaurants, which would have a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

Various factors beyond our control, including adverse weather conditions, governmental regulation, production, availability, recalls of food products and seasonality may affect our food costs or cause a disruption in our supply chain. Chicken represented approximately 18.3% and beef represented approximately 9.1% of our food purchases in 2003. We enter into annual contracts with our beef and chicken suppliers. Our contracts for chicken are fixed price contracts. Our contracts for beef are generally based on current market prices plus a processing fee. Changes in the price or availability of chicken or beef could materially adversely affect our profitability. We cannot predict whether we will be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs by adjusting our purchasing practices and menu prices, and a failure to do so could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, because we provide a “value-priced” product, we may not be able to pass along price increases to our guests.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly and could fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors due to seasonality and other factors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly because of several factors, including:

Our business is also subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the summer months and winter holiday season of each fiscal year. As a result, our quarterly and annual operating results and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate significantly as a result of seasonality and the factors discussed above. Accordingly, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year and comparable restaurant sales for any particular future period may decrease. In the future, operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In that event, the price of our common stock would likely decrease.

16

Table of Contents

A decline in visitors to any of the regional malls, lifestyle centers, big box shopping centers and entertainment centers near the locations of our restaurants could negatively affect our restaurant sales.

Our restaurants are primarily located near high activity areas such as regional malls, lifestyle centers, big box shopping centers and entertainment centers. We depend on high visitor rates at these centers to attract guests to our restaurants. If visitors to these centers decline due to economic conditions, changes in consumer preferences or shopping patterns, changes in discretionary consumer spending or otherwise, our restaurant sales could decline significantly and adversely affect our results of operations.

If we lose the services of any of our key management personnel, our business could suffer.

Our future success significantly depends on the continued services and performance of our key management personnel, particularly Mike Snyder, our chief executive officer and president; Jim McCloskey, our chief financial officer; Mike Woods, our senior vice president of franchise development; Bob Merullo, our senior vice president of restaurant operations; Todd Brighton, our vice president of development; and Eric Houseman, our vice president of restaurant operations. Our future performance will depend on our ability to motivate and retain these and other executive officers and key team members, particularly regional operations directors, restaurant general managers and kitchen managers. Competition for these employees is intense. The loss of the services of members of our senior management or key team members or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel as needed could materially harm our business.

Approximately 76.0% of our company-owned restaurants are located in the Western United States and, as a result, we are sensitive to economic and other trends and developments in this region.

We currently operate a total of 90 company-owned restaurants in the Western United States. As a result, we are particularly susceptible to adverse trends and economic conditions in this region, including its labor market. In addition, given our geographic concentration, negative publicity regarding any of our restaurants in the Western United States could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations, as could other regional occurrences such as local strikes, energy shortages or increases in energy prices, droughts, earthquakes, fires or other natural disasters.

Our future success depends on our ability to protect our proprietary information.

Our business prospects will depend in part on our ability to develop favorable consumer recognition of the Red Robin^® name and logo. Although Red Robin^®, America’s Gourmet Burgers & Spirits^® and Mad Mixology^® are federally registered trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in Canada, our trademarks could be infringed in ways that leave us without redress, such as by imitation. In addition, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how, and we employ various methods, to protect our concepts and recipes. However, such methods may not afford adequate protection and others could independently develop similar know-how or obtain access to our know-how, concepts and recipes. Moreover, we may face claims of infringement that could interfere with our use of our proprietary know-how, concepts, recipes or trade secrets. Defending against such claims may be costly and, if we are unsuccessful, we may be prevented from continuing to use such proprietary information in the future and/or be forced to pay damages. We do not maintain confidentiality and non-competition agreements with all of our executives, key personnel or suppliers. In the event competitors independently develop or otherwise obtain access to our know-how, concepts, recipes or trade secrets, the appeal of our restaurants could be reduced and our business could be harmed. We franchise our system to various franchisees. While we try to ensure that the quality of our brand and compliance with our operating standards, and the confidentiality thereof are maintained by all of our franchisees, we cannot assure that our franchisees will avoid actions that adversely affect the reputation of Red Robin or the value of our proprietary information.

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

Keeping abreast of, and in compliance with, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and The Nasdaq Stock Market rules, has required an increased amount of management attention and external resources. We remain

17

Table of Contents

committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we intend to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Risks related to the restaurant industry

Changes in consumer preferences or discretionary consumer spending could negatively impact our results of operations.

Our restaurants feature burgers, salads, soups, appetizers, other entrees such as carnitas fajitas and pasta, desserts and our signature Mad Mixology^® alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages in a family-friendly atmosphere. Our continued success depends, in part, upon the popularity of these foods and this style of casual dining. Shifts in consumer preferences away from this cuisine or dining style could materially adversely affect our future profitability. The restaurant industry is characterized by the continual introduction of new concepts and is subject to rapidly changing consumer preferences, tastes and eating and purchasing habits. While burger consumption in the United States has grown over the past 20 years, the demand may not continue to grow or taste trends may change. Our success will depend in part on our ability to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences, tastes and eating and purchasing habits, as well as other factors affecting the food service industry, including new market entrants and demographic changes. Also, our success depends to a significant extent on numerous factors affecting discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions, disposable consumer income and consumer confidence. Adverse changes in these factors could reduce guest traffic or impose practical limits on pricing, either of which could harm our results of operations.

Health concerns relating to the consumption of beef or other food products could affect consumer preferences and could negatively impact our results of operations.

Like other restaurant chains, consumer preferences could be affected by health concerns about the consumption of beef, the key ingredient in many of our menu items, or negative publicity concerning food quality, illness and injury generally, such as negative publicity concerning E. coli, “mad cow” or “foot-and-mouth” disease, publication of government or industry findings concerning food products served by us, or other health concerns or operating issues stemming from one restaurant or a limited number of restaurants. This negative publicity may adversely affect demand for our food and could result in a decrease in guest traffic to our restaurants. If we react to the negative publicity by changing our concept or our menu, we may lose guests who do not prefer the new concept or menu, and may not be able to attract a sufficient new guest base to produce the revenue needed to make our restaurants profitable. In addition, we may have different or additional competitors for our intended guests as a result of a concept change and may not be able to compete successfully against those competitors. A decrease in guest traffic to our restaurants as a result of these health concerns or negative publicity or as a result of a change in our menu or concept could materially harm our business.

Labor shortages could slow our growth or harm our business.

Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain a sufficient number of qualified, high-energy team members. Qualified individuals of the requisite caliber and number needed to fill these positions are in short supply in some areas. The inability to recruit and retain these individuals may delay the planned openings of new restaurants or result in high employee turnover in existing restaurants, which could harm our business. Additionally, competition for qualified team members could require us to pay higher wages to attract sufficient team members, which could result in higher labor costs. Most of our employees are paid on an hourly basis. These employees are paid in accordance with applicable minimum wage regulations. Accordingly, any increase, whether state or federal, could have a material adverse impact on our business.

18

Table of Contents

We are subject to extensive government laws and regulations that govern various aspects of our business. Our operations and our ability to expand and develop our restaurants may be adversely affected by these laws and regulations, which could cause our revenues to decline and adversely affect our growth strategy.

The restaurant industry is subject to various federal, state and local government regulations, including those relating to the sale of food and alcoholic beverages. While at this time we have been able to obtain and maintain the necessary governmental licenses, permits and approvals, the failure to maintain these licenses, permits and approvals, including food and liquor licenses, could adversely affect our operating results. Difficulties or failure in obtaining the required licenses and approvals could delay or result in our decision to cancel the opening of new restaurants. Local authorities may suspend or deny renewal of our food and liquor licenses if they determine that our conduct does not meet applicable standards or if there are changes in regulations.

We are subject to “dram shop” statutes in some states. These statutes generally allow a person injured by an intoxicated person to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to the intoxicated person. A judgment substantially in excess of our insurance coverage could harm our financial condition.

Various federal and state labor laws govern our relationship with our employees and affect operating costs. These laws include minimum wage requirements, overtime pay, unemployment tax rates, workers’ compensation rates, citizenship requirements and sales taxes. Additional government-imposed increases in minimum wages, overtime pay, paid leaves of absence and mandated health benefits such as those to be imposed by recently enacted legislation in California, increased tax reporting and tax payment requirements for employees who receive gratuities, or a reduction in the number of states that allow tips to be credited toward minimum wage requirements could harm our operating results.

The Federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodations and employment. Although our restaurants are designed to be accessible to the disabled, we could be required to make modifications to our restaurants to provide service to, or make reasonable accommodations for, disabled persons.

We are also subject to federal regulation and state laws that regulate the offer and sale of franchises and aspects of the licensor-licensee relationship. Many state franchise laws impose restrictions on the franchise agreement, including limitations on non-competition provisions and the termination or non-renewal of a franchise. Some states require that franchise materials be registered before franchises can be offered or sold in the state.

A significant increase in litigation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and business prospects.

As a participant in the restaurant industry, we are sometimes the subject of complaints or litigation from guests alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Recently, the restaurant industry also has been subject to an increase in claims that the menus and practices of restaurant chains have led to the obesity of some guests. Adverse publicity resulting from these allegations could harm our restaurants, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are liable. In fact, we are subject to the same risks of adverse publicity resulting from these sorts of allegations even if the claim actually involves one of our franchisees. Further, employee claims against us based on, among other things, discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination may divert our financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations.

Our success depends on our ability to compete effectively in the restaurant industry.

Competition in the restaurant industry is increasingly intense. We compete on the basis of the taste, quality, and price of food offered, guest service, ambiance and overall dining experience. We believe that our operating concept, attractive dining value and quality of food and guest service, enable us to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Our competitors include a large and diverse group of restaurant chains and individual restaurants that range from independent local operators that have opened restaurants in various markets, to well-capitalized national restaurant companies. In addition, we compete with other restaurants and with retail establishments for real estate. Many of our competitors are well established in the casual dining market segment and some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than do we.

19

Table of Contents

Risks related to our company

Our ability to utilize our revolving credit agreement and our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited, which could adversely impact our business.

Our revolving credit agreement contains a number of restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, engage in mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures and sale-leaseback transactions, and to sell assets, incur indebtedness, make investments, create liens and pay dividends. Our revolving credit agreement also requires us to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios and tests. These restrictions could affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. In addition, because our revolving credit agreement expires in May 2006, we cannot give any assurance that we will be able to renew this agreement at or prior to that time.

Changes in our operating plans, acceleration of our expansion plans, lower than anticipated sales, increased expenses or other events, including those described in this section, may cause us to seek additional debt or equity financing on an accelerated basis. Financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could negatively impact our growth and other plans as well as our financial condition and results of operations. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the holders of our common stock and debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants and/or financial ratios that restrict our ability to operate our business.

Our stock price may be volatile.

The market for equity securities has been extremely volatile. The following factors could cause the price of our common stock in the public market to fluctuate significantly:

Our common stock began trading on July 19, 2002, and prior to this date there was no public market for shares of our common stock. The stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Fluctuations or decreases in the trading price of our common stock may adversely affect stockholders’ ability to trade their shares. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations.

Some of our stockholders could exert significant influence or control over us, and may not make decisions that are in the best interests of all stockholders.

As of March 2, 2004, Quad-C, through its affiliates, owns approximately 13.3% of our outstanding common stock and Mike Snyder owns approximately 9.4% of our outstanding common stock. Our officers, directors and principal stockholders, i.e., stockholders holding more than 5.0% of our common stock, including Quad-C and Mike Snyder, together hold approximately 26.6% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, acting individually or together, could exert significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of our company, and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. Also, the interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our interests as a company or the interest of other stockholders. Accordingly, Quad-C, Mike Snyder and these other stockholders could cause us to enter into transactions or agreements that our other shareholders might not approve. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws require a 66 ²/3% supermajority vote of our stockholders only to remove a director or to amend specified provisions of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws.

20

Table of Contents

Provisions in Delaware law and our charter may prevent or delay a change of control, even if that change of control may be beneficial to our stockholders.

We are subject to the Delaware anti-takeover laws regulating corporate takeovers. These anti-takeover laws prevent Delaware corporations from engaging in business combinations with any stockholder, including all affiliates and associates of the stockholder, who owns 15.0% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock, for three years following the date that the stockholder acquired 15.0% or more of the corporation’s voting stock unless specified conditions are met.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws include a number of provisions that may deter or impede hostile takeovers or changes of control of management. These provisions:

21

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Properties

We currently lease the majority of our company-owned restaurant facilities under operating leases with remaining terms ranging from one to 25 years. Some of our leases contain options permitting us to renew our lease for additional years at then prevailing market rates. The majority of our leases include both minimum rent and percentage-of-sales rent provisions.

We own real estate for 16 company-owned restaurants located in Mesa, Peoria, and Prescott, Arizona; Moreno Valley and Yuba City, California; Castle Rock and Highlands Ranch, Colorado; Columbia, Maryland; St. Peters, Missouri; North Olmstead and Westchester, Ohio; Oxford Valley, Pennsylvania; Fairlakes, Glen Allen (Richmond) and Potomac Mills, Virginia; and Issaquah, Washington.

We own properties in Fayetteville, Arkansas and Chagrin Highlands, Ohio where we plan to develop new company-owned restaurants. In addition, we own one property in Lake Howell, Florida and a second property in Grapevine, Texas, both of which we lease to others. See “Restaurant Locations” under Item I for additional details regarding our restaurants.

We lease approximately 1,500 square feet of regional office space in Seattle, Washington, under an agreement expiring in October 2005. In addition, we lease approximately 2,900 square feet of regional office space in Tustin, California, under an agreement expiring in December 2007. The Tustin lease includes an option to extend for five years.

Our corporate headquarters are located in Greenwood Village, Colorado. We occupy this facility under a lease that expired in January 2004. We have extended the lease on our current headquarters through April 30, 2004, with an option to terminate early on March 31, 2004 if we so chose. On December 9, 2003 we entered into a lease for a new headquarters office near our existing corporate headquarters, for a 7-year term commencing in April 2004. We do not expect to suffer any business interruption resulting from our relocation.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

Occasionally, we are a defendant in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business, including claims resulting from “slip and fall” accidents, employment related claims and claims from guests or team members alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. To date, none of these types of litigation, all of which are generally covered by insurance policies, has had a material effect on us, and as of the date of this filing, we are not a party to any litigation that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business.

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

22

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market’s National Market under the symbol RRGB. The table below sets forth the high and low per share sales prices for our common stock as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market’s National Market. Our initial public offering became effective in July 2002. There was no established public trading market for our common stock prior to that date.

As of March 1, 2004, there were approximately 2,300 holders of our common stock.

Dividends

We did not declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock during 2003 or 2002. We currently anticipate that we will retain any future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business. In addition, our revolving credit agreement prohibits us from declaring or paying any dividends or making any other distributions on any of our shares, subject to specified exceptions. Accordingly, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our 2004 proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our registered securities during fourth quarter 2003.

23

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table contains selected consolidated financial and operating data. The statement of income, cash flow and balance sheet data for each year has been derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by independent auditors. You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

24

Table of Contents

In May 2000, we purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of one of our largest franchisees, The Snyder Group Company, for $23.7 million, plus liabilities assumed of $20.0 million, thereby acquiring 14 restaurants. In addition, in May 2000, we sold 4,310,344 shares of our common stock to affiliates of Quad-C for $25.0 million. The proceeds were used to pay off debentures and promissory notes, as well as pay down bank debt and fund new restaurant construction. These transactions significantly changed our capital structure

25

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Organization of Information

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides a narrative on our financial performance and condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain risk factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors” under Item 1 and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. This section includes the following discussions:

Overview

Red Robin is a casual dining restaurant chain focused on serving an imaginative selection of high quality gourmet burgers in a family-friendly atmosphere. We currently own and operate 118 casual dining restaurants under the name “Red Robin^® America’s Gourmet Burgers & Spirits^®” in 14 states and have 107 additional restaurants operating under franchise or license agreements in 22 states and two Canadian provinces. During 2003, we opened 18 new company-owned restaurants and assumed operations of one existing franchise restaurant. Ten new franchise restaurants were opened during 2003.

Our fiscal years ended December 28, 2003, December 29, 2002 and December 30, 2001 are referred to as 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Each year presented included 52 weeks. We also refer to our fiscal year ending December 26, 2004, as 2004.

Change in Method of Calculating Comparable Restaurant Sales

During 2003, we changed our method of calculating company-owned comparable restaurant sales. Under our new method, restaurants become comparable in the first period following five full quarters of operations. Prior to this change, our restaurants became comparable in the first period following the first full fiscal year of operations. We believe the new method of calculating comparable restaurant sales is a more meaningful measure given our accelerated new restaurant unit growth, and that our new methodology is more in line with industry practices. Throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, we present company-owned comparable restaurant sales using the new method for all periods presented.

The ten restaurants that we acquired from two franchisees during first quarter 2002 were also included as comparable restaurants for 2003. These restaurants had been open an average of 7.8 years as of the beginning of 2003, and as a result we believed it was more meaningful to include the acquired restaurants in our calculation of comparable restaurant sales. Including the acquired restaurants, our company-owned comparable restaurant sales for 2003 increased 4.1% over 2002. Had we not included these ten restaurants, comparable restaurant sales for 2003 would have increased 4.4% over 2002.

26

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Our operating results for each fiscal year presented below are expressed as a percentage of total revenues below, except for the components of restaurant operating costs, which are expressed as a percentage of restaurant revenues:

2003 compared to 2002

Total revenues. Total revenues increased by $54.2 million, or 19.8%, to $328.6 million, from $274.4 million, due primarily to a $53.4 million increase in restaurant revenues. The increase in restaurant revenues was due to $28.1 million of revenues from 18 new restaurants opened and the one franchise restaurant we assumed operation of during 2003, $13.6 million in additional revenues from the non-comparable restaurants that we opened in 2002, $1.7 million related to a full year of revenues for the ten restaurants we acquired from two franchisees during first quarter 2002 and $10.0 million from comparable restaurant sales increases of 4.1%. The increase in comparable restaurant sales was driven by an increase in guest counts of 4.0% and an increase in the average guest check of 0.1%.

Franchise royalties and fees increased $754,600, or 8.8%, to $9.3 million from $8.6 million. Franchise royalties increased $603,700, or 7.2%, to $9.0 million, from $8.4 million, due to an increase in royalties attributable to new franchise restaurants, comparable U.S. franchise restaurant revenues increases of 3.7%, and an increase in royalties from our Canadian franchisee primarily due to more favorable currency exchange rates. Royalties from the ten new franchise restaurants opened during 2003 were partially offset because four franchise restaurants closed and we assumed the operations of one additional franchise restaurant in April 2003. Franchise fees increased $150,900, or 91.0%, to $316,700, from $165,800, because ten franchise restaurants were opened in 2003 compared to five in 2002.

27

Table of Contents

Cost of sales. Cost of sales increased by $14.1 million, or 23.1%, to $75.2 million, from $61.1 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated during 2003. Cost of sales as a percentage of restaurant revenues increased 0.6%, to 23.6%, from 23.0%. Overall, the increase as a percentage of restaurant revenues was attributable to increases in certain food costs during 2003, including gourmet breads, hamburger, produce and pork. In addition, we experienced a slight increase as a percentage of restaurant revenues because of a shift in product mix at our comparable restaurants towards salads. To help offset increased commodity price pressure, we implemented a menu price increase in January 2004.

Labor. Labor expenses increased by $18.9 million, or 20.0%, to $112.9 million, from $94.0 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated in 2003. Overall, labor expense as a percentage of restaurant revenues was 35.4% in 2003 and 2002. Labor as a percentage of restaurant revenues was 35.1% at our comparable restaurants and 37.1% at our non-comparable restaurants. Total wages as a percentage of restaurant revenues decreased 0.7% during 2003, due to improvements in controllable labor and floor supervisory wages at our non-comparable restaurants and the ten restaurants we acquired in 2002. However, these improvements were entirely offset by an increase of 0.4% for self-insured workers’ compensation expenses, 0.2% for bonus expenses and 0.1% for payroll tax expenses. The increase in bonus expenses was primarily due to higher bonuses earned as a result of improved comparable restaurant sales. Our workers’ compensation expense increased during 2003 due to a combination of higher claims experienced and higher per claim costs. We cannot predict with certainty whether or not our workers’ compensation expense will continue to increase in 2004.

Operating. Operating expenses increased by $7.7 million, or 18.9%, to $48.1 million, from $40.4 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated in 2003. Operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant revenues decreased 0.1%, to 15.1%, from 15.2%. We believe the improvement as a percentage of restaurant revenues was due in part to our 4.1% increase in comparable restaurant sales and the discontinuance of one of our marketing funds midway through first quarter 2003, for which we had previously contributed 0.3% of restaurant revenues. These improvements were partially offset by higher utilities, paper packaging costs, telecommunications charges and credit card processing fees. Based on recent trends, we anticipate potentially significant increases in natural gas and electricity expenses during 2004. However, at this time, we cannot forecast the impact these increases may have on operating expenses.

Occupancy. Occupancy expenses increased by $3.5 million, or 19.6%, to $21.6 million, from $18.1 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated in 2003. Occupancy expense as a percentage of restaurant revenues was 6.8% in 2003 and 2002. Occupancy expense as a percentage of restaurant revenues at our comparable restaurants was 7.1%, compared to 6.9% the prior year. This increase was driven by higher occupancy expense as a percentage of restaurant revenues at the ten restaurants we acquired in 2002, partially offset by leverage gained from improvement in our comparable restaurant sales. Occupancy expense as a percentage of restaurant revenues at our non-comparable restaurants was 5.2%, which is lower than our comparable restaurants due to the fact that we own, or have ground leases, on a greater percentage of our non-comparable restaurants as compared to our comparable restaurants.

Restaurant closures and impairment. We recorded a $1.1 million non-cash impairment charge in 2002 to fully write-down all of the long-lived assets related to one restaurant, which we continue to operate.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $3.2 million, or 25.2%, to $16.1 million, from $12.9 million. The increase was primarily due to the addition of 18 new restaurants opened in 2003 and a full year of depreciation related to the ten restaurants we opened during 2002. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues increased 0.2%, to 4.9%, from 4.7%. The increase as a percentage of total revenues is primarily a result of higher depreciation per restaurant on our newer restaurants.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $1.8 million, or 8.7%, to $22.0 million, from $20.2 million, generally due to additional headcount, higher salaries and related costs attributable to operating more company-owned restaurants and to costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues, however, decreased 0.7%, to 6.7%, from 7.4%. The improvement in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues is due primarily to a decrease in marketing expenditures and to our 4.1% increase in comparable restaurant sales. In addition, we had unfilled positions in 2003 that we did not fill until fourth quarter 2003 that positively impacted our results in 2003.

28

Table of Contents

Franchise development. Franchise development expenses decreased $407,900, or 12.5%, to $2.8 million, from $3.3 million. Franchise development expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 0.3%, to 0.9%, from 1.2%, due primarily to several unfilled positions that we did not fill until fourth quarter 2003 and to a related reduction in other franchise development expenses, including travel and legal.

Pre-opening costs. Pre-opening costs increased $1.3 million, or 68.4%, to $3.2 million, from $1.9 million, due primarily to the fact that there were 18 company-owned restaurants opened during 2003, compared to ten during 2002. Pre-opening costs as a percentage of total revenues increased 0.3%, to 1.0%, from 0.7%. Pre-opening costs for the restaurants we opened in 2003 averaged $178,600 per restaurant compared to an average of $181,000 per new restaurant in 2002. Pre-opening costs recognized in 2003 related to restaurants we intend to open in 2004 were not significant.

Gain on lease buy-out. During 2002, we realized a non-recurring gain of $945,000 due to a landlord lease buy-out of one of our company-owned restaurants and, as a result, we relocated the restaurant to a new location during 2002.

Impairment of real estate held for sale. During 2002, we recognized a $150,000 charge to reduce the carrying value of real estate held for sale to its estimated fair value less cost to sell. This property was subsequently sold in 2002 for its approximate carrying value.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $2.8 million, or 48.4%, to $3.0 million, from $5.8 million. The decrease was due primarily to lower average borrowings outstanding and a reduction in the overall interest rate of our debt in 2003, compared to 2002. Our average borrowings outstanding decreased because net proceeds from our July 2002 initial public offering and our November 2003 secondary offering were used to repay significant portions of our then outstanding borrowings.

Interest income. Interest income decreased $57,200, or 14.4%, to $340,700, from $397,900. The 2003 results include interest income of $298,800 from related party notes receivable, compared to $252,200 in 2002. The remaining change was attributable to decreases in interest income from franchisees and interest earned on our overnight sweep accounts.

Loss on extinguishment of debt. During 2003, we incurred $257,500 of charges related to the exercise of three capital lease purchase options and the payoff of various real estate and equipment loans, which included a $186,400 non-cash write-off of capitalized debt issuance costs. During 2002, we incurred $4.3 million of charges related to prepayment penalties of $1.9 million and a $2.4 million non-cash write-off of capitalized debt issuance costs. Debt extinguished in 2003 had a carrying value of $11.4 million compared to $52.9 million in 2002, excluding penalties and fees.

Other. Other income was $14,200 in 2003, compared to other expense of $105,800 in 2002. Other expense principally includes holding costs associated with real estate held for sale, offset in 2003 by a gain on the sale of real estate.

Income before income taxes. As a result of the above, income before income taxes increased $11.5 million, or 92.8%, to $23.8 million, from $12.3 million.

Provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes increased $4.0 million, or 97.7%, to $8.1 million, from $4.1 million. The increase was due primarily to increased pre-tax earnings and an increase in our estimated effective income tax rate. Our effective income tax rate for 2003 was 33.9%, compared to 33.1% for 2002.

29

Table of Contents

Net income. As a result of the above, net income increased by $7.5 million, or 90.4%, to $15.7 million, from $8.3 million.

2002 compared to 2001

Total revenues. Total revenues increased by $49.9 million, or 22.2%, to $274.4 million, from $224.5 million, due primarily to a $50.6 million increase in restaurant revenues. The increase in restaurant revenues was due to $26.1 million in restaurant revenues derived from ten restaurants acquired from two franchisees in first quarter 2002, $14.7 million of restaurant revenues from ten new restaurants opened in 2002, $9.6 million in additional restaurant revenues from the non-comparable restaurants that we opened prior to 2002, and $2.8 million from comparable restaurant sales increases of 1.8%. For 2002, the increase in comparable restaurant sales was driven by an increase in guest counts of 1.5% and an increase in the average guest check of approximately 0.3% compared to 2001. These increases in restaurant revenues were offset by one restaurant closure in 2002, and two restaurant closures in 2001 that contributed $2.6 million more in revenue in 2001 than in 2002. We believe that unfavorable local economic conditions originally related to a downturn in the telecommunications and technology industries had an adverse affect on restaurant revenues in our Seattle, Portland and Denver markets, which combined represented 45.7% of our comparable sales for 2002. For these markets, comparable restaurant sales for 2002 decreased 0.9%. Excluding these markets, comparable restaurant sales increased 3.9%.

Franchise royalties and fees decreased by $437,000, or 4.9%, to $8.6 million, from $9.0 million. Franchise royalties decreased $121,700, or 1.4%, to $8.4 million, from $8.5 million. This was due in part to the fact that there were fewer franchise restaurants open during 2002 because we acquired ten franchise restaurants during first quarter 2002. In addition, comparable restaurant sales for our franchisees, upon which royalties are primarily based, declined 0.5% in the U.S. and 8.1% in Canada during 2002 compared to the prior year. Franchise fees decreased $315,300, or 65.5%, to $165,800, from $481,100, because there were five new franchise restaurant openings in 2002 compared 16 new franchise restaurant openings in 2001.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales increased by $10.2 million, or 20.0%, to $61.1 million, from $50.9 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated during 2002. Cost of sales as a percentage of restaurant revenues decreased 0.7%, to 23.0%, from 23.7%. This reduction in cost of sales as a percentage of restaurant revenues was primarily a result of favorable commodity pricing and in part due to continuing management initiatives to reduce the cost of food and beverage products, reduce waste in our restaurants and improve margins.

Labor. Labor expenses increased by $19.2 million, or 25.6%, to $94.0 million, from $74.9 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated during 2002. Labor expenses as a percentage of restaurant revenues increased 0.6%, to 35.4%, from 34.8%. Labor increased as a percentage of restaurant revenues at comparable restaurants 0.4%, from 34.5% of restaurant revenues, to 34.9%. The increase as a percentage of sales at comparable restaurants was due in part to higher controllable labor and floor supervisory wages as well as increased benefit costs. We also experienced higher controllable labor, floor support, management salaries and taxes and benefits at the restaurants we opened and acquired in 2001 and 2002 when compared to labor at comparable restaurants. Labor as a percentage of restaurant revenues for the 2001 and 2002 new and acquired restaurants was 38.1% in 2002.

Operating. Operating expenses increased by $7.2 million, or 21.8%, to $40.4 million, from $33.2 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated in 2002. Operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant revenues decreased to 15.2%, from 15.4%. The decrease was due primarily to utility expenses, which decreased 0.4%, to 2.6% of restaurant revenues, compared to 3.0% in 2001. Utility expenses were higher all over the country in 2001, but especially in Southern California, where electricity costs were significantly higher during certain periods during 2001 compared to 2002. Excluding utilities, operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant revenues increased 0.1%, to 12.6% in 2002, from 12.5% in 2001.

Occupancy. Occupancy expenses increased by $3.3 million, or 22.4%, to $18.1 million, from $14.8 million, due primarily to more restaurants being operated in 2002. Occupancy expenses as a percentage of restaurant revenues decreased 0.1%, to 6.8%, from 6.9%, primarily due to the fact that our restaurant revenues increased at a rate greater than the fixed component of our occupancy costs.

30

Table of Contents

Restaurant closures and impairment. We recognized a $1.1 million non-cash impairment charge in 2002 to fully write down all of the long-lived assets related to one restaurant, which we continue to operate. The $36,000 loss in 2001 represented the write down of residual value related to one restaurant originally impaired in 2000.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $2.4 million, or 22.8%, to $12.9 million, from $10.5 million. The increase was primarily due to the additional depreciation on the ten restaurants opened in 2002, six new restaurants opened during 2001, and ten restaurants acquired in first quarter 2002. As reported, depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of total revenues was 4.7% in 2002 and 2001. However, 2001 results include $1.6 million of amortization related to goodwill and other intangible assets that are no longer being amortized as of the beginning of 2002. Excluding the $1.6 million of amortization charges, depreciation would have increased 0.8%, from 3.9% of total revenues in 2001, to 4.7% of total revenues in 2002. The primary reason for this change is attributable to higher depreciation per unit on our 2001 and 2002 restaurant openings.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $3.5 million, or 20.3%, to $20.3 million, from $16.8 million. Overall, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 0.1% to 7.4%, compared to 7.5%. The increase in expense is primarily a result of additional headcount and higher salaries and related costs attributable to operating more company-owned restaurants and to increased legal and accounting costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. Restaurant operations, marketing and legal costs increased as a percentage of total revenue, whereas design and construction, human resources and accounting costs decreased as a percentage of total revenue when compared to 2001. Costs related to management information systems, purchasing and executive management were relatively unchanged as a percentage of total revenues.

Franchise development. Franchise development expenses decreased $448,000 to $3.3 million, from $3.7 million, and decreased 0.4% as a percentage of total revenues to 1.2%, from 1.6%. The decrease in franchise development expenses was primarily due to the fact that the franchisees opened fewer new restaurants in 2002, compared to 2001.

Pre-opening costs. Pre-opening costs increased by $1.0 million to $1.9 million, from $921,000. The increase was due primarily to opening ten restaurants in 2002, compared to six in 2001. Average pre-opening costs per restaurant increased an average of $28,000 for restaurants opened in 2002, compared to restaurants opened in 2001. This increase was due to the fact that during 2002 we opened a higher proportion of new restaurants in markets where we did not have significant market penetration compared to new restaurant openings in 2001. Pre-opening costs related to restaurant openings in newer markets are typically higher than pre-opening costs in our more mature markets due to increased labor, training, travel and marketing supplies costs.

Gain on lease buy-out. During 2002, we realized a non-recurring gain of $945,000 due to a landlord lease buy-out of one of our company-owned restaurants. As a result, we relocated the restaurant to a new location during 2002. The early termination fee received of $1.4 million was presented net of related charges of $235,600 for the disposal of property and equipment from the original restaurant that was non-transferable and other non-recurring charges associated with the relocation of $204,400.

Impairment of real estate held for sale. During 2002, we recognized a $150,000 charge to reduce the carrying value of real estate held for sale to its estimated fair value less cost to sell. This property was subsequently sold in 2002 for its approximate carrying value.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $2.1 million, or 26.5%, to $5.8 million, from $7.9 million. The decrease was due primarily to lower average borrowings during 2002, as well as a reduction in the overall effective interest rate of our variable rate debt.

Interest income. Interest income decreased by $348,000 to $398,000, from $746,000. The decrease was primarily related to lower average cash balances during 2002, as well as lower average interest rates. The 2002 results include interest income of $252,200 from related party notes receivable, whereas there was no related party interest income during 2001.

31

Table of Contents

Loss on extinguishment of debt. During 2002, we incurred a $1.9 million charge attributable to prepayment penalties and a $2.4 million non-cash write-off of certain capitalized debt issuance costs that resulted when we used proceeds from our initial public offering, together with borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, to repay all outstanding borrowings under our Finova term loan and U.S. Bank revolving credit facility, as well as one real estate loan and three equipment loans. We early adopted SFAS 145 in 2002 and consequently did not classify the loss on extinguishment of debt as an extraordinary item.

Other. Other expense was $105,800 for 2002, compared to other expense of $190,400 in 2001. Other expense principally includes holding costs associated with real estate held for sale.

Income before income taxes. As a result of the above, income before income taxes increased $898,000, or 7.8%, to $12.3 million, from $11.4 million.

Provision for income taxes. The provision for income taxes increased to $4.1 million, from $3.7 million. The increase was due to the $898,000 increase in income before income taxes as well as change in our effective tax rate from 32.5% to 33.1%.

Net income. As a result of the above, net income increased by $539,000, or 7.0%, to $8.3 million, from $7.7 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $74,000 in 2003. We attempt to keep only enough cash on hand to satisfy our working capital requirements, which can vary substantially as a result of seasonality, construction and other corporate needs. All available cash in excess of our estimated working capital needs are generally used to repay short-term borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. The change in cash and cash equivalents for the most recent three fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operations in 2003 increased $10.8 million, or 37.2%, to $39.9 million, compared to $29.1 million in 2002, reflecting increased cash flow from restaurant and franchise operations, lower cash payments for interest, lower cash payments related to the extinguishment of debt, and increased cash flow from changes in operating assets and liabilities. These increases were partially offset by higher income tax payments and other non-cash adjustments to net income.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities during 2003 increased $8.8 million, or 19.5%, to $53.8 million, compared to $45.0 million in 2002. Our investing activities consist primarily of purchases of property and equipment related to the construction of new restaurants and remodels and capital improvements of our existing company-owned restaurants. We may also have activity related to the acquisition of franchise restaurants. Our cash inflows from investing activities generally relate to proceeds from the sale of real estate, property and equipment.

Capital Expenditures. In 2003, we opened 18 new restaurants for a total cost of $35.8 million and invested $10.7 million on remodels and capital improvements of our existing restaurants, including a franchise restaurant we assumed operations of during 2003. In addition, we spent $6.1 million in 2003 related to future restaurant openings, and $2.0 million for corporate initiatives primarily related to information systems and computer equipment. During 2002, we opened ten new restaurants and relocated one restaurant for a total cost of $21.3 million, spent $6.4 million on remodels and capital improvements, $7.3 million on restaurants opened in 2003, $800,000 for corporate

32

Table of Contents

initiatives including information systems and computer equipment and $3.8 million to acquire the assets of three restaurants from a former franchisee. In addition, during 2002, we spent $6.3 million to acquire six restaurants from Western Franchise Development, Inc., a franchisee.

During 2004, we expect to open 20 to 22 new company-owned restaurants for a total cost of $50.0 million to $52.0 million and $6.3 million to $6.6 million on restaurant remodels and capital improvements of our existing restaurants. In addition, we expect to invest $2.7 million to $2.8 million for corporate initiatives, including information systems and computer equipment. Our investment for corporate initiatives includes an estimate of $1.8 million related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters during 2004. For additional information regarding the relocation of our corporate headquarters see “Properties” included in Item 2 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Proceeds from Investing Activities. Proceeds of $860,000 in 2003 were generated primarily from the sale of one property held for sale. Proceeds of $921,000 in 2002 were generated primarily from the sale of one property held for sale.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities during 2003 increased $12.2 million. Our financing activities consist primarily of borrowings used to fund restaurant construction and other corporate needs in excess of cash provided by operations and proceeds we receive from sales of common stock. Cash used in financing activities is primarily related to the repayment of various borrowings. During 2004, we expect our primary source of cash provided by financing activities will be obtained from additional borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.

Proceeds from the Issuance of Stock. In July 2002, we completed an initial public offering from which we received net proceeds of $42.8 million. Concurrently, we entered into a three-year $40.0 million revolving credit agreement. Net proceeds from our initial public offering, together with new borrowings from our revolving credit agreement were used to repay $55.0 million of then outstanding debt, including accrued interest and prepayment penalties.

During November 2003, we completed a secondary public offering in which we sold 750,000 shares, at a price of $26.50 per share. We received proceeds of $18.0 million from the offering, net of $1.0 million of underwriting fees and commissions and $868,200 of other offering costs. We used the net proceeds from this offering to repay borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit agreement.

Other proceeds of $695,000 were received from the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock under our employee stock purchase plan.

Borrowings. During May 2003, we amended our $40.0 million revolving credit agreement to increase our maximum borrowing capacity to $85.0 million, and to extend the term of the agreement through May 19, 2006. The amendment of our revolving credit agreement resulted in $755,700 of debt issuance costs that we will amortize ratably over the remaining life of the agreement. This agreement is in place to fund the construction and acquisition of new restaurants, to refinance existing indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The amended revolving credit agreement is secured by a first priority pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock of our subsidiaries and a first priority lien on substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets. We are currently in compliance with all covenants related to the revolving credit agreement.

33

Table of Contents

During 2003, our borrowings of long-term debt totaled $38.0 million, excluding $1.7 million of new capital lease obligations, and our payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations totaled $42.1 million. Debt outstanding during the year had stated interest rates ranging from 2.1% to 13.4% and maturities ranging from 2003 through 2021. Our borrowing activity in 2003 was as follows (in thousands):

We were required under our revolving credit agreement to exercise the purchase options related to our restaurant leases in Highlands Ranch, Colorado; Issaquah, Washington; and Grapevine, Texas. The exercise of the Highlands Ranch purchase option was completed in January 2003 for $4.0 million, the exercise of the Issaquah purchase option was completed in August 2003 for $3.7 million and the exercise of our Grapevine purchase option was completed in September 2003 for $3.5 million. In addition, during second quarter 2003, we elected to repay $3.1 million of various real estate and equipment loans. These loans were payable monthly over remaining terms ranging from three to eight years and were subject to fixed interest rates ranging from 7.9% to 9.7%. The exercise of the capital lease purchase options and prepayment of the real estate and equipment loans resulted in $257,500 of charges for loss on extinguishment of debt, including $186,400 of non-cash expenses related to the write-off of capitalized debt issuance costs. We do not currently plan early repayments of any borrowings during 2004, and our revolving credit agreement does not require the early extinguishment of any additional borrowings.

As of December 28, 2003, borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit agreement bore interest at approximately 3.4%. On September 30, 2003, an irrevocable letter of credit issued under our revolving credit agreement was increased to $2,041,000. This letter is being maintained to back our self-insured workers’ compensation program and reduces the amount of borrowings available on our revolving credit agreement. Our total committed borrowing capacity, capacity used and unused borrowing capacity as of the end of 2003 were as follows (in thousands):